Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(24,185 posts)

7. Well, Garland can still be complicit without

Wed May 7, 2025, 06:12 PM

May 2025

letting those other parties off the hook. IMO this was a multi-institutional f*$$#ck up with more than enough blame to go around.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Merrick Garland was complicit. [View all] LuvLoogie May 2025 OP

Gods I'm so sick of that quisling's name LearnedHand May 2025 #1

Very weak person. And a Republican, so should not be a surprise NewHendoLib May 2025 #3

Funny how nobody ever seems to claim the Roberts court was complicit Fiendish Thingy May 2025 #4

Cheap shot Ponietz May 2025 #9

That's my point precisely Fiendish Thingy May 2025 #13

These posts are unconvincing and carry no special weight with me Ponietz May 2025 #20

Those are all subjective opinion pieces Fiendish Thingy May 2025 #21

Whatever Ponietz May 2025 #22

Agree. Oopsie Daisy May 2025 #11

Garland fucking SUCKED Skittles May 2025 #12

He was not the man for the job. Baitball Blogger May 2025 #5

As usual the real villains McConnell Hassler May 2025 #6

Well, Garland can still be complicit without senseandsensibility May 2025 #7

I can think of plenty of worse Dem AG's Fiendish Thingy May 2025 #15

Senate confirmed him 70-30 MichMan May 2025 #17

I'm thinking he gambled on Joe's reelection Ponietz May 2025 #10