General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Remember When Wikipedia Was Considered Suspect? [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Please think more carefully when attacking me.
Active reduction is praising fetuses and then neglecting children or making their lives more difficult the way right wingers do.
Active reduction is killing people by being anti-vax.
Active reduction is by cutting off foreign food aid.
Active reduction is by supporting ethnic cleansing they way Israel is in their over-reaction to the hideous egregious Hamas attack.
Active reduction is by de-regulation of food production company inspections and data collection.
Active reduction is by preventing people fleeing murderous regimes from seeking and gaining asylum.
Active reduction is by enabling the Russian aggressors in their invasion and occupation of Ukrainian areas and not supporting the freedom and sovereignty of Ukraine.
There are many more examples of active reduction.
Don't confuse prevention of population growth by exercise of rights (which can lead to population reduction) with active reduction.
If you are not clear on the distinction keep discussing it.
Technically you are free to "discuss things" but my advice is that impugning my motives and false accusing me of aligning with anti-abortionist when there was no evidence that I did is a personal attack, ... that "discussing" that way damages your discussion and (whether you intend or not) damages me. It certainly makes me uncomfortable. That is my advice.
It is it your intention to severely discomfort me the way you have? If it is not then don't do it to me or anybody. that is simply my advice.