Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
12. Actually I have a large solar plant that pays me well now that CA requires it.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 03:27 PM
Dec 2012

Us solar guys are getting a bit of a free ride. The big solar guys even more so. The locally generated power is requiring more transmission capacity and there is not a good funding model to cover the costs. No different than wind or other local generation approaches. While all good things, it presents some new challenges.

The current subsidies lowers consumer power bills. If we ever went to a true "what it costs to provide you power" model, many consumers would be freezing in the dark. That is unacceptable.

We are moving away from coal/oil/nuclear and to some extent centrally generated and manged power. A good thing, but its not going to happen overnight.

My point is that the production model for power generation is changing and it is moving faster than the cost and payment models. That needs to get fixed. That is not support for subsidies, its a desire to get ahead of the game as we move to a renewable based power.

And that is quite progressive.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Solar power adds to nonus...»Reply #12