Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NowsTheTime

(1,147 posts)
85. How do you defeat the incomprehensible? How do people not choose democracy? How do you fix stupid?
Sat May 17, 2025, 11:45 AM
May 17

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

FoxNews has to be dismantled [View all] clevergrrrl May 16 OP
"I'll bet you that a good 90% of these people that supposedly voted for him couldn't actually tell you a policy position Demovictory9 May 16 #1
I Lay It All On The Doorstep of FOXNEWS Mr.Bee May 17 #79
Can Ya Hear Me Now damifino10 May 17 #83
Joe Rogan was mocking Biden for talking about airports in the revolutionary war. Gary 50 May 17 #84
Right there was a turning point Envirogal May 17 #102
Thats how it goes with them. Hypocrisy is staggering Demovictory9 May 17 #151
Hypocrisy is one of their entitlements. dchill May 17 #152
The person they voted for can't explain policy either. yonder May 17 #103
.... MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #104
Cause bdamomma May 17 #141
And newsmax, oan, RT and ....... Clouds Passing May 16 #2
Let's not forget JMCKUSICK May 16 #22
Heinous they are..... Clouds Passing May 16 #42
Hi Clouds Passing JMCKUSICK May 16 #43
They are the masters of social engineering. Gum Logger May 17 #138
There's been no real anti-fox movement. No protests, no political boycott. tman May 16 #3
You're correct clevergrrrl May 16 #5
Yep! There needs to be ReRe May 16 #20
Forget protests Hieronymus Phact May 16 #31
excellent point. None. Or 40 years of Limbaugh. Evolve Dammit May 16 #33
Because there are consequences for that speech in the UK LittleGirl May 17 #87
Exactly!!! MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #89
anti-trust laws? Cirsium May 17 #106
"Musk stole the election" The prevailing theory I saw here was that he used Starlink Bonx May 16 #4
Then why skydive forever May 16 #11
And you know this... how? Mr. Evil May 16 #19
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" Bonx May 16 #34
Insufficient evidence is available when... Chemical Bill May 16 #46
How does one go about dismantling a media outlet? MichMan May 16 #6
You start by burning the Constitution onenote May 16 #9
That is incorrect, we are talking about the free market here clevergrrrl May 16 #13
You said they shouldn't be "allowed" onenote May 16 #15
the people can allow or disallow clevergrrrl May 16 #17
The right wing dominates Cirsium May 16 #28
Oh, good, just like reproductive rights. mahatmakanejeeves May 16 #30
I'll say it Cirsium May 16 #26
So newspapers shouldn't be protected? onenote May 16 #58
Huh? Cirsium May 17 #99
You couldn't be more wrong about Douglas onenote May 17 #122
Not germane Cirsium May 17 #124
And your claim means what? MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #126
Politics Cirsium May 17 #139
I'm interested in hearing what anticompetitive behavior FoxNews is engaging in onenote May 17 #148
I can't help you Cirsium May 17 #149
I don't like Fox News. But I'm not the one onenote May 17 #150
Nice to hear Cirsium May 18 #159
Umm, what broadcasting license would you be talking about? MarineCombatEngineer May 16 #47
Could Vladimir come here and spin up a new channel called VladTV and that would be perfectly legal oldmanlynn May 17 #76
If it's on cable, internet or satellite, MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #77
That is Libertarian doctrine Cirsium May 17 #108
Libertarian doctrine? MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #113
Can he start a broadcast channel? No. Could he start a satellite delivered network? Probably. onenote May 17 #90
Thank you. MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #91
Yeah, but there was Republicans who stepped up and said that's enough. You can't obstruct justice oldmanlynn May 17 #75
It's actually pretty easy... AnAccidentalActivist May 16 #35
Cable channels don't need broadcast licenses Sympthsical May 16 #36
Thank You!!! MarineCombatEngineer May 16 #49
This is not about the First Amendment Cirsium May 17 #109
Are you a US citizen? MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #115
Is anyone? Cirsium May 17 #143
Ok, ya got me there. MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #144
Thanks Cirsium May 17 #146
Fair enough. MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #147
FCC broadcast licenses do not apply to cable outlets MichMan May 16 #37
That was my entire point which everyone seemed to miss AnAccidentalActivist May 17 #63
Your point wasn't missed, it was factually false MichMan May 17 #65
Right out the gate this is what you said... MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #66
Well, bye. stumpysbear May 17 #67
I think the regulations should apply to satellite and cable as well if they don't Meowmee May 17 #140
By shredding the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. MarineCombatEngineer May 16 #50
They are shredding it anyway LS0999 May 17 #70
Ok, so Faux gets banned, not going to happen, but just for shits and giggles, MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #71
William O. Douglas disagrees Cirsium May 17 #114
Yes, but what you seem to be missing is that in '69, cable, internet and satellite were non existent, MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #116
Whatever Cirsium May 17 #123
It is entirely relevant to the thread, MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #125
Yes Cirsium May 17 #129
You don't know that's what she meant, MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #131
I know what I meant Cirsium May 17 #137
anti-trust law Cirsium May 17 #107
The trouble is that any restriction markodochartaigh May 16 #7
The answer... Hieronymus Phact May 16 #32
Not much of an answer. Mosby May 16 #59
What's your answer? Hieronymus Phact May 17 #61
It's Supreme Court doctrine onenote May 17 #68
False equivalency Cirsium May 17 #145
Amen hurple May 16 #8
100% vapor2 May 16 #10
Yes Iamscrewed May 16 #12
I agree we might win in 2026 and 2028 and then the cyle continues Tribetime May 16 #14
Yes, fascism is taking over in increments clevergrrrl May 16 #16
We need more education on what Fascism is: ReRe May 16 #25
I imagine dismantling media outlets that disagree with the state would fit the definition MichMan May 16 #40
Yep, that sounds like an act of fascism for sure. eom ReRe May 16 #57
Monopolies Cirsium May 17 #112
You're preaching to the choir, unfortunately. Wednesdays May 17 #60
Oh really? ReRe May 17 #62
Absolutely agree with this statement: slightlv May 16 #18
Meaning (I trust) 'dismantled' via B.See May 16 #21
Clevergrrrl, Mr. Evil May 16 #23
I agree with everything you said. ReRe May 16 #29
Yup. Throw those fucks out. Joinfortmill May 16 #24
LOL DENVERPOPS May 16 #27
Hear, hear! defacto7 May 16 #38
Good luck Meowmee May 16 #39
clever Skittles May 16 #41
Any entity powerful enough to shut down Fox... WarGamer May 16 #44
Never gonna happen Greg_In_SF May 16 #45
Relatively few adults watch Fox News Kaleva May 16 #56
If it's that inconsequential because so few people watch, why all the angst here and elsewhere then? MichMan May 17 #64
It's a convenient bogeyman Kaleva May 17 #86
Yeah, start holding your breath on that suggestion now and if wishes were horses, elocs May 16 #48
Maybe occupy it? StopTheFARCE.051625 May 16 #51
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote May 17 #111
Welcome to DU pdxflyboy May 16 #52
Dismantled? MarineCombatEngineer May 16 #53
If the problem is "the feeble minds of Middle America and Rural America" then the larger problem is democracy. Jim__ May 16 #54
It would be nice if we had a reasonable media that accurately labeled right wing propaganda as such. unblock May 16 #55
Of course Nixon and Reagan were elected long before there was a Fox News. onenote May 17 #69
Nixon and Reagan were, in their own ways, both quite adept politicians unblock May 17 #97
Absolutely spot on. Nothing will change until Fox is dismantled or the total collapse of our society. Pepsidog May 17 #72
Since the OP hasn't replied to my question, I'll ask you, MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #73
Agreed, how do we let an Australian oligarch oldmanlynn May 17 #74
100+!! InAbLuEsTaTe May 17 #78
We have nothing like... Mike Nelson May 17 #80
Which is their absolute right under our 1A, MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #81
Thank you. If people would pay attention to what the Trump FCC is doing they might think twice onenote May 17 #92
The question is how? JustAnotherGen May 17 #82
How do you defeat the incomprehensible? How do people not choose democracy? How do you fix stupid? NowsTheTime May 17 #85
Ron White said it best. MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #88
90 percent of Krasnov's campaign ads in my red district were about one policy position. GoodRaisin May 17 #93
Those ads ran incessantly in my area harping on two things, VP Harris supporting surgery for trans inmates and when Silent Type May 17 #96
Thing is, we handled that very poorly. The campaign never pushed back on the ad GoodRaisin May 17 #105
No question. We didn't respond quickly or effectively in 2016 either. Silent Type May 17 #110
Don't watch or care for FOX, but I'd oppose dismantling FOX as unconstitutional and we might be next. Silent Type May 17 #94
That's what those advocates of this crap don't seem to grasp, MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #95
Some folks really do love their dictator porn. tritsofme May 17 #98
I'll actively oppose dismantling FOX SCantiGOP May 17 #100
.... MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #101
I don't think Fox should be forced to close. creeksneakers2 May 17 #117
When I took Journalism looking at it as a possible career.... mdbl May 17 #119
They don't even try to be accurate creeksneakers2 May 17 #121
I do Cirsium May 17 #127
.... MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #128
Pretty condescending Cirsium May 17 #132
I couldn't care less if you advocate this, that's the great thing about our Constitution. MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #134
It rights don't belong to everybody creeksneakers2 May 18 #156
Correct Cirsium May 18 #158
Also, freedom of the press must belong to everybody. creeksneakers2 May 18 #161
Absurd Cirsium May 18 #162
Then we have a way to fight back creeksneakers2 May 18 #163
Oh, I agree Cirsium May 18 #164
:) creeksneakers2 May 18 #165
Didn't FDR also put Japanese Americans in internment camps ? MichMan May 18 #157
Oh, I see Cirsium May 18 #160
Protesters bdamomma May 17 #118
Yep, they should be out in force in front of their NY offices, MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #120
+1000 hadEnuf May 17 #130
We will never get our country back bdamomma May 17 #133
Anything else you'd like to see banned because you don't like it? flvegan May 17 #135
.... MarineCombatEngineer May 17 #136
No thank you. Everyone has the right to watch what they want, and no voices should be shut down. Groundhawg May 17 #142
Rupert Murdoch ruined American media Funtatlaguy May 17 #153
How would you propose we dismantle Fox News within the parameters of the 1st Amendment and kelly1mm May 17 #154
*ALL* corporatized media k_buddy762 May 18 #155
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FoxNews has to be dismant...»Reply #85