Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Pam Bondi should lose her law license -- Sabrina Haake [View all]
Last edited Sun May 18, 2025, 08:40 AM - Edit history (1)
https://sabrinahaake.substack.com/p/pam-bondi-should-lose-her-law-licenseBondi’s public statements defy rules of impartiality
Lawyers who work for the government have a duty to seek justice, whether facts lead to acquittal or conviction. For that reason, they are expected to avoid public statements displaying partiality because such statements undermine public trust in the legal system. The American Bar Association directs in Rule 3.6 that:
A lawyer who is participating… in the investigation or litigation of a matter shall not make an extrajudicial (outside the court) statement that … will be disseminated (publicly) and have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing (a case.)
In other words, try your case in court, not on TV. Only supported facts of evidence are allowed in a court room; demagoguery, and assertions of opinion unsupported by admissible evidence, are not allowed. That is why judges have frequently admonished Trump attorneys that statements to the press are not evidence.
Despite the clarity of the ABA rule, Bondi routinely argues pending cases in the media, particularly on Fox News, where she falsely asserts that it is up to Trump to decide what the law is. Every first year law student is taught that the judicial branch, not the executive, decides what the law is.
. . .
Lawyers who work for the government have a duty to seek justice, whether facts lead to acquittal or conviction. For that reason, they are expected to avoid public statements displaying partiality because such statements undermine public trust in the legal system. The American Bar Association directs in Rule 3.6 that:
A lawyer who is participating… in the investigation or litigation of a matter shall not make an extrajudicial (outside the court) statement that … will be disseminated (publicly) and have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing (a case.)
In other words, try your case in court, not on TV. Only supported facts of evidence are allowed in a court room; demagoguery, and assertions of opinion unsupported by admissible evidence, are not allowed. That is why judges have frequently admonished Trump attorneys that statements to the press are not evidence.
Despite the clarity of the ABA rule, Bondi routinely argues pending cases in the media, particularly on Fox News, where she falsely asserts that it is up to Trump to decide what the law is. Every first year law student is taught that the judicial branch, not the executive, decides what the law is.
. . .
Other sections from Ms. Haake's post:
Bondi intentionally misconstrues orders
Bondi’s team abuses pleading rules
Bondi has turned the DOJ into Trump’s personal law firm
Follow the dirty money
As I see it, Bondi has already met the threshold of bad faith for disbarment. An attorney who trashes the rule of law must know that eventually she will be barred from practicing it.
Bondi’s team abuses pleading rules
Bondi has turned the DOJ into Trump’s personal law firm
Follow the dirty money
As I see it, Bondi has already met the threshold of bad faith for disbarment. An attorney who trashes the rule of law must know that eventually she will be barred from practicing it.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read