Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Time Is Right For A "National Workers Association"...... [View all]global1
(25,225 posts)7. As I Indicated In My Original Post.....
"It could initially be organized around current unions and they could immediately become the core of such an organization."
I also indicated that unions in general have been losing their effectiveness since the Reagan days. That is why I would like to take the terms 'union' and 'labor' out of the name of such an organization because they have been tainted by years of Republican's bashing them and many employers concerns about them.
"Workers" - seems to be a more palatable term in my opinion. Any one that works - would see themselves as eligible to join such an organization. Even many workers out there seem to have a negative perspective on 'unions' and 'labor. In many cases - now - people in the same company might be union and non-union employees. Sometimes the non-union employees are at odds with those in their same company that are in a union.
Terming this as "workers" would put every worker on an equal footing.
My thought was to start fresh and leave the old/current way of doing things out of it - and bring new life and a new excitement to protecting workers rights.
I also indicated that unions in general have been losing their effectiveness since the Reagan days. That is why I would like to take the terms 'union' and 'labor' out of the name of such an organization because they have been tainted by years of Republican's bashing them and many employers concerns about them.
"Workers" - seems to be a more palatable term in my opinion. Any one that works - would see themselves as eligible to join such an organization. Even many workers out there seem to have a negative perspective on 'unions' and 'labor. In many cases - now - people in the same company might be union and non-union employees. Sometimes the non-union employees are at odds with those in their same company that are in a union.
Terming this as "workers" would put every worker on an equal footing.
My thought was to start fresh and leave the old/current way of doing things out of it - and bring new life and a new excitement to protecting workers rights.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
29 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I like the idea. I'm retired but I would join. Would you accept former workers as members
Cleita
Dec 2012
#3
I Think It Would Be Appropriate For Such An Organization To Have A "Retired Workers" Component.....
global1
Dec 2012
#6
I was going to say, we had one: The Industrial Workers of the World and they were persecuted, beaten
byeya
Dec 2012
#17
some reading: this guy is an old unionist and has some ideas on using the existing union structure
HiPointDem
Dec 2012
#5
if you read what the guy says, he basically feels the same. he presents pretty convincing evidence
HiPointDem
Dec 2012
#14
I'm All For That And Using Aspects Of The Existing Stucture Rather Than Creating From The Ground Up.
global1
Dec 2012
#16
I don't need to think it should replace the unions of today but could exist side by side with
Cleita
Dec 2012
#10
the thought is that rather than organize from the ground up, use the organizing structure that
HiPointDem
Dec 2012
#13
And have a shark atty negotiating for the org. Corporations would be begging for unions to return.
Michigan Alum
Dec 2012
#11
Exactly - And That's Why I Suggested Forming Such An Organization On The NRA Model....
global1
Dec 2012
#18