Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety [View all]nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)35. Dependent clauses is not your strong point
Is it?
You can have your infantry battle riffle as long as you guarantee the free state within the well regulated militia. So when are you reporting for drill?
I think Hamilton, who mentioned individuals zero times in Federalist 29... Had a good clue as to original intent...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety [View all]
Fresh_Start
Dec 2012
OP
Actually that map says nothing. What it does is take violent crime per 100,000 and divide it by the
Flabbergasted
Dec 2012
#34
No our Constitution does not give us that right. Rights exist with or without words on paper.
jody
Dec 2012
#16
But it's not giving up "our" freedom...it's giving up THEIR freedom for OUR security
HereSince1628
Dec 2012
#3
You say generically "mental illness" do you mean many / any MI should disqualify a person?
HereSince1628
Dec 2012
#25