Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: F-35C jet fighter unable to land on carriers [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)2. You mean the carrier version can't, actually, land on carriers? Whoops.
Still, I'd be interested in seeing a source that isn't rt.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Unbelievable. They've been manufacturing planes to land on carriers for how many years?
gateley
Jan 2012
#1
You mean the carrier version can't, actually, land on carriers? Whoops.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2012
#2
F-35B is in trouble also. DoD failed with the multi purpose aircraft F-111, lucked out by chance
jody
Jan 2012
#5
Been in combat myself. That's why I identify with the Marines who were fed up and said "Piss on it"!
jody
Jan 2012
#16
That sounds like one of those "a small child could spot this" design flaws. (nt)
Posteritatis
Jan 2012
#7
No sweat re oxygen, just restrict F-35s to less than 12k feet altitude. In the meantime DoD has
jody
Jan 2012
#18
Lockheed says the fix is underway & should be retested in 2nd quarter of this year
pinboy3niner
Jan 2012
#24
Most likely solution: Give more money to the MIC to develop a shinier model with more chrome.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2012
#43