Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Happy Hoosier

(9,002 posts)
15. Yes, of course....
Fri Jun 13, 2025, 04:14 PM
Jun 13

I have a MS is Systems Engineering and work in the aerospace field. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is part of my bread and butter.

They would have do a complete bottom up FMEA to identify and eliminate catastrophic failures. That doesn’t mean a mistake wasn’t made. The most common mistake is that the MTBF of a component was much lower than predicted.

With a dual engine failure, there would have to be a common root cause. From what I know, the most likely root causes are the fuel, or improper maintenance. That’s where i think we’re 90% to find the cause. Of course, it’s early, so as data emerges, we may learn something that changes that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Boeing 787 Dreamliner and...»Reply #15