Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Attilatheblond

(9,266 posts)
32. And when the USS Constitution needs to be turned twice a year, who ya gonna call?
Fri Jun 13, 2025, 06:20 PM
Jun 2025

Yep, the guys who trained on the USCG Eagle.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kick SheltieLover Jun 2025 #1
Judge said ruling on the marines is beyond his scope. Wonder what the process is for that. Amaryllis Jun 2025 #2
Yeah. EndlessWire Jun 2025 #3
If Krasnov JustAnotherGen Jun 2025 #5
I can only hope DENVERPOPS Jun 2025 #6
If the shooting starts, the looting starts, IN EARNEST--- not this penny-ante stuff Jack Valentino Jun 2025 #19
I don't think it is looting JustAnotherGen Jun 2025 #22
exactly what came to me yesterday, when I read about this case scheduled for a ruling. msfiddlestix Jun 2025 #23
the question then is, will they follow unconstitutional orders? nt Javaman Jun 2025 #25
The Coast Guard doesn't fall under that act because we are currently under the Department of Homeland Security and LT Barclay Jun 2025 #18
TY! n/t EndlessWire Jun 2025 #21
Coast Guard Normanart Jun 2025 #24
And some of their OLD ships are still there Attilatheblond Jun 2025 #26
We still get a lot of hand me downs. LT Barclay Jun 2025 #29
Nobody puts transport planes to better use that the USCG, in my opinion Attilatheblond Jun 2025 #31
We have deployed in every major conflict for 2 reasons: LT Barclay Jun 2025 #27
And when the USS Constitution needs to be turned twice a year, who ya gonna call? Attilatheblond Jun 2025 #32
Didn't know that. Thanks! LT Barclay Jun 2025 #35
Is it because Coast Guard falls under Homeland Security? woodsprite Jun 2025 #28
Can't remember what year is was when Homeland got the CG. Attilatheblond Jun 2025 #33
Don't forget MW67 Jun 2025 #4
Here's the actual ruling. pnwmom Jun 2025 #7
Thank you, pnwmom... I'll add it to the original post... hlthe2b Jun 2025 #10
Interesting but irrelevant - the judge in this case (Charles Breyer) is the brother of former SCOTUS Justice Stephen Bre TheRickles Jun 2025 #8
Trump will issue a scathing attack on him newdeal2 Jun 2025 #15
**Updated above with overview of decision but looking for a linked summary** hlthe2b Jun 2025 #9
Watch what the Supreme Court does 😑 In It to Win It Jun 2025 #11
I'm glad to hear he's going to rule quickly... slightlv Jun 2025 #12
Nope... There were NO OFFFICIAL ORDERS ISSUED. Thus, nothing these NG are doing is legal, they won't be paid hlthe2b Jun 2025 #14
"Vigilante justice" ?? Jack Valentino Jun 2025 #20
Now bdamomma Jun 2025 #13
See my post above. The NG has no choice unless another court intercedes.. hlthe2b Jun 2025 #16
if the guard refuses their commanders can be brought up on state charges moonshinegnomie Jun 2025 #17
If there is no longer any law that will hold stillcool Jun 2025 #30
The decision has been blocked by the 9th circuit temporarily DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2025 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»**Breaking/Updated: Judge...»Reply #32