Does it strike anyone as important that the CT shooter had Aspergers and it is often treated with...

[liberalhistorian]

144. Nice way to deflect the fact

that you do not even answer the point that you are incorrect regarding his diagnosis and possible medical treatment, the fact that you are repeating as fact information that has not yet been shown to be a fact, on both counts. But then again, that's what people do who don't have an answer to the questions being asked of them or the points being made. They simply claim "personal attack" and run from the room.

I simply pointed out that you were wrong about a definitive AS diagnosis, that there was no evidence of that other than speculation and hearsay, and that you also don't know what, if any, medicine he was taking. You had no answer to that. You've also had no sufficient answer to the fact that AD's are not a specific treatment for AS and that many AS are not on any medical treatment whatsoever (because there IS none for AS). You get angry when people don't go along with or understand your "facts" in your posts, but you start a thread with not one, but TWO incorrect assumptions, which you state as definitive fact, and have no response when that's pointed out to you and you don't seem to care how you might be affecting those with AS, or those who take AD. You have no response other than whining about an alleged "personal attack." Which means, then, that you have no legitimate response at all.