General Discussion

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)

13. The home may not have been in her name

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 06:31 PM

Dec 2012

A settlement could have been very easily structured so that she lived there free of charge since the son was with her..

I never suggested that he was happy to be free of alimony...just that he bought his way out with the large alimony and perhaps the house as well..

Rich men buy their way out of marriages all the time.

She could have had very few :assets: of her own..

I personally know people who have held onto a house, post divorce for this very reason.. He got the deduction for interest paid and retained ownership, and the wife continued to live there with the kids.

Perhaps you have read the divorce settlement.. I was only opining what "could" have been a settlement that would have given her a place to live, money to live on, and yet not retain much as "assets"

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could the Newtown shooter's estate be sued? [View all] raccoon Dec 2012 OP

Probably, but maybe not in this case... OneMoreDemocrat Dec 2012 #1

Don't think Adam had anything davidn3600 Dec 2012 #2

Yes GeorgeGist Dec 2012 #3

It will be difficult to prove. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #4

Word is, she was trying to have him committed. That's a clear indicator that kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #5

No it's not. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #8

Probably. But what would he have? dairydog91 Dec 2012 #6

Probably, but it might take some time to work out the complications. JVS Dec 2012 #7

No TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #9

Any assets may have actually "belonged" to the Dad anyway. He paid her a tidy sum of alimony SoCalDem Dec 2012 #10

mom and dad's assets would have been divided as a result of the divorce TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #11

The home may not have been in her name SoCalDem Dec 2012 #13

She got the house in the divorce settlement TorchTheWitch Dec 2012 #17

whatever... you certainly seen "invested" in this.. SoCalDem Dec 2012 #18

You don't inherit from someone you kill. That's the bottom line. Lex Dec 2012 #15

More likely to sue the town of Newtown, for failure to protect the kids KinMd Dec 2012 #12

That would be an epic bad move. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #16

Homeowner insurance may cover events. Secondly, Mom may be held kiranon Dec 2012 #14