Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalArkie

(19,919 posts)
10. Inside the RawStory was the original. SubStack article that I am sure that the NY TIMES, WaPo, CNN and others must
Thu Jun 26, 2025, 05:26 PM
Jun 2025

read all the time..

Critical Hurricane Forecast Tool Abruptly Terminated

On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Defense announced it would immediately stop ingesting, processing, and transmitting data essential to most hurricane forecasts.

The announcement was formalized on Wednesday when NOAA distributed a service change notice to all users, including the National Hurricane Center, that by next Monday, June 30th, they would no longer receive real-time microwave data collected aboard three weather satellites jointly run by NOAA and the U.S. Department of Defense.

The permanent discontinuation of data from the Special Sensor Microwave Imager Sounder (SSMIS) will severely impede and degrade hurricane forecasts for this season and beyond, affecting tens of millions of Americans who live along its hurricane-prone shorelines.

The news on Wednesday sent users across the weather and climate community – including those monitoring changes to sea ice extent in the polar regions – scrambling to understand the rationale behind the abrupt termination. Though not immediately clear why the real-time data was suddenly discontinued, the decision appears to have stemmed from Department of Defense security concerns.

Snip

https://michaelrlowry.substack.com/p/critical-hurricane-forecast-tool

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Criminal... ultralite001 Jun 2025 #1
Oh, no, the DoD is still going to tell important people what the satellite data says AZJonnie Jun 2025 #3
Those satellites are going dark... ultralite001 Jun 2025 #8
And you believe this ... why? AZJonnie Jun 2025 #11
Deal w/ this data... ultralite001 Jun 2025 #14
That's pretty good then AZJonnie Jun 2025 #21
I'm not clicking on rawstory because I hate their site (not them, just their site and clickbait headlines) AZJonnie Jun 2025 #2
Good for you! I feel the same way! Often... Oopsie Daisy Jun 2025 #4
Inside the RawStory was the original. SubStack article that I am sure that the NY TIMES, WaPo, CNN and others must LiberalArkie Jun 2025 #10
Thanks! (It's not you... it's RawStory... they suck.) Oopsie Daisy Jun 2025 #13
They are usually fast delivering the story.. It was several hours later before anything else showed up. LiberalArkie Jun 2025 #17
Sorry about that as they had the lead.. LiberalArkie Jun 2025 #9
Wasn't being critical of your choice, I just personally can't stand how their site looks and operates AZJonnie Jun 2025 #12
I use MSN for Wapo and NYtimes stories as they have the story without the paywall. LiberalArkie Jun 2025 #15
Wellgood Rebl2 Jun 2025 #5
Most of which are chock full of MAGA misanthrope Jun 2025 #26
Sounds like dweller Jun 2025 #6
Brilliant! peggysue2 Jun 2025 #7
Putin wants to destroy America. So here we are. Cha Jun 2025 #16
I totally agree. As long as the plutocrats have everything who cares about non-oligarchy peeps. LiberalArkie Jun 2025 #18
Yes.. the clues are in Cha Jun 2025 #19
No.. It is a win win..He is so diversified that he could come out for Bernie and still have more wealth LiberalArkie Jun 2025 #22
Yes.. the clues are in Cha Jun 2025 #20
Was this about competition with Musk links? Jit423 Jun 2025 #23
Horrible, and expected. Plenty of other reports that cover projected tracking, equally as good halobeam Jun 2025 #24
This is so that he no longer has to do the hard work of drawing on a map with a sharpie. LudwigPastorius Jun 2025 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hurricane expert sounds a...»Reply #10