Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MichMan

(17,176 posts)
1. More about PAYGO
Fri Jul 4, 2025, 11:48 AM
Jul 2025
While the PAYGO principle can exist as an informal norm or an internal congressional rule, it was formally re-established as federal law through the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010. This Act was signed into law by President Barack Obama on February 12, 2010, as Title I of Public Law 111-139 (H.J.Res. 45) and is codified at 2 U.S. Code § 931 et seq. Its stated purpose was to “reestablish a statutory procedure to enforce a rule of budget neutrality on new revenue and direct spending legislation”.

The legislative path of the Act saw it introduced in the House of Representatives by then-Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. It was eventually attached in the Senate to legislation raising the federal debt limit and passed largely along party lines, with a majority of Democrats supporting it and a majority of Republicans opposing it. This attachment to “must-pass” debt limit legislation is a common legislative tactic but also underscores the high stakes involved in both fiscal rules and debt management.

The Statutory PAYGO Act of 2010 applies specifically to new legislation that affects direct spending (also known as mandatory or entitlement spending) and revenues. If a new law is projected to increase direct spending or decrease revenues, it must be offset by corresponding spending cuts or revenue increases so as not to increase the deficit.

However, the law includes several key exclusions, significantly narrowing its effective scope:



https://govfacts.org/explainer/understanding-pay-as-you-go-paygo-vs-statutory-paygo-in-federal-budgeting/

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

More about PAYGO MichMan Jul 2025 #1
Everyone needs to know this, esp. by midterms. Dixiegrrrl Jul 2025 #2
The entire Republican Party except Sen. Massie and Rep. Fitzpatrick. kerry-is-my-prez Jul 2025 #14
On Wednesday one republican said: Congessmen aren't Trump's little bitches yliza Jul 2025 #3
That Smirking Bastard Robertmiller1220 Jul 2025 #4
An honest question for you... llmart Jul 2025 #6
Johnson Constitutional Scholar Robertmiller1220 Jul 2025 #7
There really is no official designation of "constitutional scholar". llmart Jul 2025 #11
All Good Points Robertmiller1220 Jul 2025 #12
Thanks. llmart Jul 2025 #16
"My naive notion of how anyone with a law degree is intelligent" misanthrope Jul 2025 #18
When you get older BidenRocks Jul 2025 #5
An attack on seniors pure and simple. Fuck 'em. Evolve Dammit Jul 2025 #8
republicon lies are legion BoRaGard Jul 2025 #9
Because Mr.Bee Jul 2025 #10
As usual, AARP hasn't mentioned this one WilliamPlanke Jul 2025 #13
AARP isn't lobbying this because they own Ruby the Liberal Jul 2025 #15
Yeah. Fuck AARP progressoid Jul 2025 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans Are Cutting M...»Reply #1