Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(65,175 posts)
1. That's nice. He's "reconsidering" his vote against funding to let local govs create warning networks . . .
Sun Jul 6, 2025, 09:40 PM
Jul 2025

But don't worry. I'm sure he'll have plenty of time to decide to vote against the next such measure, in the unlikely event that it ever comes to the floor for a vote.

On edit - oh, and it gets better:

EDIT

“I don't think there was enough evidence to even suspect something like this was going to happen,” he said. ”I think even if you had a warning system there, this came in so fast and early in the morning it's very unlikely the warning system would have had much effect.”

Virdell said he doesn’t recall the specifics of the bill or why he opposed it, though he guessed ”it had to do with how much funding” was tied to the measure.

Ed. - Except for little things like massive flash floods being a thing in the region, of course - like the one that killed ten people less than 40 years ago . . . .

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Texas lawmakers failed to...»Reply #1