Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,764 posts)
11. No and no
Mon Jul 7, 2025, 06:58 PM
Jul 2025

A TRO is just to hold the status quo in place while the opposing party has an opportunity to respond to the case (in this case just two weeks).

A preliminary injunction is a longer-term pause while the case is heard (often many months or even a few years) - and it requires the judge to find that the plaintiff is likely to win on the merits and would be irreparably harmed if they didn't receive it.

The recent SCOTUS ruling was essentially that a single district judge could not see a case with one plaintif and issue a nationwide injunction blocking executive action. But in this case, the single plaintiff is already a national organization. So blocking executive action against that one plaintiff is close to a nationwide decision already

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R UTUSN Jul 2025 #1
I thought Congress could not be overruled Bluestocking Jul 2025 #2
Why did you think that? Mad_Machine76 Jul 2025 #4
That's What The Judiciary Does ProfessorGAC Jul 2025 #7
Doesn't seem to matter much of late Attilatheblond Jul 2025 #14
That Wasn't The Question ProfessorGAC Jul 2025 #18
I didn't reply to a question Attilatheblond Jul 2025 #22
I Did ProfessorGAC Jul 2025 #23
They can if what Congress does is potentially Unconstitutional. cstanleytech Jul 2025 #16
Please see, TomSlick Jul 2025 #19
"" AllaN01Bear Jul 2025 #3
Is that the same as an injunction? druidity33 Jul 2025 #5
It's not a nationwide injunction of the kind addressed by the Supreme Court. onenote Jul 2025 #9
No and no FBaggins Jul 2025 #11
Planned Parenthood is guaranteed federal funding and no one can take it away, not even Congress. MichMan Jul 2025 #6
That isn't true. onenote Jul 2025 #8
Regardless, that is the practical effect of the ruling MichMan Jul 2025 #12
It's just preserving the status quo. It's only a 2 week order. In It to Win It Jul 2025 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author FBaggins Jul 2025 #13
Did you use the wrong emoji? TomSlick Jul 2025 #21
And 6 Supreme Court justices mountain grammy Jul 2025 #10
Exactly. No one can be that naive? lostincalifornia Jul 2025 #17
Really? I see naive comments here every day. Gimpyknee Jul 2025 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Federal judge i...»Reply #11