Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Eric Swalwell: [View all]

W_HAMILTON

(10,420 posts)
3. Good point, which I hadn't thought of.
Tue Jul 8, 2025, 02:23 PM
Jul 2025

I thought of a similar rationale, though, that pointed to why Trump almost assuredly was on Epstein's client list. I'll copy and paste it here as well:

If there was any big-name Democrat on that list, regardless of whether there were Republicans or not, Trump would have happily had his people release it because he would care more about hurting the big-name Democrats he constantly attacks than protecting any Republican other than himself.

And yet it wasn't released.

That says to me (1) there were no big-name Democrats on it and/or (2) Trump is plastered all over that list and releasing even a portion of it would have spelled doom for his big orange ass because the entire list would have eventually been seen through discovery once his MAGA goons did end up charging someone.
Eric Swalwell: [View all] applegrove Jul 2025 OP
K&R spanone Jul 2025 #1
Hear, HEAR! ZDU Jul 2025 #2
Good point, which I hadn't thought of. W_HAMILTON Jul 2025 #3
But, but the FBI says there is no list. Gimpyknee Jul 2025 #7
The FBI also told The New York Times that it didn't see a link between Trump and Russia. W_HAMILTON Jul 2025 #12
The FBI is headed by Kash Patel. hadEnuf Jul 2025 #15
AMEN! ancianita Jul 2025 #4
Boom! FalloutShelter Jul 2025 #5
How can on be in a non-existent file? n/t returnee Jul 2025 #6
We know there are files. Even if there's nothing else (doubtful), there are massive files of information Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #9
If there's a non-existent file, why did Pam Bondi say the list of clients was sitting on her desk to review? W_HAMILTON Jul 2025 #13
My intention was to point out... returnee Jul 2025 #23
Rather Obvious, Don'cha Think? Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #8
He can prove his innocence by releasing the files IronLionZion Jul 2025 #10
Nails it. republianmushroom Jul 2025 #11
There is also the issue that neither Bondi's nor Patel's word is anything to bet on. MLWR Jul 2025 #14
PREACH IT BROTHER ERIC Skittles Jul 2025 #16
And we have TACO denying ever being Hassler Jul 2025 #17
Good read by Swalwell! kentuck Jul 2025 #18
If it speaks volumes Hornedfrog2000 Jul 2025 #19
If he doesn't sue, it must be true... Wounded Bear Jul 2025 #20
I love it! 💙 live love laugh Jul 2025 #22
Bwah! 🥇 electric_blue68 Jul 2025 #25
If no list is true, why aren't repugs dancing with joy and showing no fear of the orange one. Hotler Jul 2025 #21
I would also bet he knows that Musk actually has the receipts (and is willing to show them) ToxMarz Jul 2025 #24
K&R Simeon Salus Jul 2025 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Eric Swalwell»Reply #3