Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gun Control Now - Fact Driven Rant [View all]X_Digger
(18,585 posts)6. FP 29 was a treatise on how best to maintain the militia.. so?
Hamilton was arguing for strong oversight of the militia, as opposed to the anti-federalists who preferred decentralized control.
The compromise between them was codified in the constitution's language providing central control of the militia, with officers drawn from the states.
None of that has bearing on the scope of the right that the second amendment protects.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You seriously thing they wouldn't have protected the very method they'd just used?
Lizzie Poppet
Dec 2012
#40
I believe you have to take it within the context of the language of the amendment
Toronto
Dec 2012
#7
All are valid exercises of the right, yes. (protection of self, family, home, state)
X_Digger
Dec 2012
#19