Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gun Control Now - Fact Driven Rant [View all]Toronto
(183 posts)7. I believe you have to take it within the context of the language of the amendment
A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, being the best security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; but no person religiously scrupulous shall be compelled to bear arms.
So if you were to put that in 21st century english you would probably write " a regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, which is the best security of a free State, ensures that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be enfringed...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You seriously thing they wouldn't have protected the very method they'd just used?
Lizzie Poppet
Dec 2012
#40
I believe you have to take it within the context of the language of the amendment
Toronto
Dec 2012
#7
All are valid exercises of the right, yes. (protection of self, family, home, state)
X_Digger
Dec 2012
#19