Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gun Control Now - Fact Driven Rant [View all]jmg257
(11,996 posts)12. You forgot the FACT that the Militia Laws passed by Congress in support
of the new Constitution mandated that the people supply themselves with muskets AND PISTOLS, and all associated acoutrements.
It was simply the government's new role to come up with guidlines to ensure there was uniformity - in the arms the people supplied themselves for militia duty, and the organization and training so the State Militias, when called into a federal role, could be most effective.
Supply themselves - not to ensure they would "have enough" but to ensure THE GOVERNMENT could not control the flow of arms the people used in defence of themselves and their liberties.
The intent of the 2nd amendment is simple - to secure the people right to keep and bear arms, a primary reason being their vital role in the Militias.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You seriously thing they wouldn't have protected the very method they'd just used?
Lizzie Poppet
Dec 2012
#40
I believe you have to take it within the context of the language of the amendment
Toronto
Dec 2012
#7
All are valid exercises of the right, yes. (protection of self, family, home, state)
X_Digger
Dec 2012
#19