General Discussion

onenote

(46,324 posts)

36. Why would they deny her?

Sun Jul 13, 2025, 07:15 PM

Jul 2025

She isn't seeing a new trial. She is seeking the complete dismissal of her prosecution based on the argument that there was a plea deal in place that prevented her from being prosecuted.

That being said, I think the Court will deny her petition for cert because it's a pretty tenuous argument, based on a 2007 plea agreement between federal prosecutors in Florida and Epstein that purports to give immunity to unnamed co-conspirators. The government's position has been that the plea agreement did not prevent federal prosecutors in New York from pursuing charges against Maxwell.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

JUST IN: Maxwell appealing to SCOTUS TOMORROW for retrial. [View all] flamingdem Jul 2025 OP

Come on, SCROTUS will deny her. Too much at stake for tsf chicoescuela Jul 2025 #1

Mango man has probably called flamingdem Jul 2025 #2

Would not be surprised chicoescuela Jul 2025 #3

Why would they deny her? onenote Jul 2025 #36

yeah... given what Pam Bondi had drumpf have said recently, I heard a few people asking "if all this is true, then Takket Jul 2025 #4

As long as it keeps Epstein in the news johnnyfins Jul 2025 #5

She facilitated dozens of sexual abuse crimes. Found and trained the young women. nt allegorical oracle Jul 2025 #9

But - if they can't produce the men she trained the women for?? womanofthehills Jul 2025 #13

She was convicted. Her appeal challenges her having been tried after a plea deal was entered in another circuit. onenote Jul 2025 #17

YES MorbidButterflyTat Jul 2025 #37

Scheme with Epstein Starbeach Jul 2025 #6

So we arrest one woman and not the hundreds of men womanofthehills Jul 2025 #14

Given that Trump has claimed Dems wrote the files, this may get interesting. Raven123 Jul 2025 #7

🎯 She's not wrong to bring it Arazi Jul 2025 #8

He may pardon her to ensure that she stays quiet. nt allegorical oracle Jul 2025 #10

She knows she can never talk womanofthehills Jul 2025 #12

I remember those headlines in the day bucolic_frolic Jul 2025 #27

Her Father Was Accused of Embezzlement MrWowWow Jul 2025 #30

Her appeal was filed months ago and has nothing to do with recent events. onenote Jul 2025 #16

Thanks for the info Raven123 Jul 2025 #19

Ah, thank you Arazi Jul 2025 #21

My thoughts as well Raven123 Jul 2025 #18

Ya can't have it both ways. This might be interesting. Biophilic Jul 2025 #11

She is not appealing tomorrow. She already appealed. Tomorrow is the deadline for the government response onenote Jul 2025 #15

Thanks for the info, but the article does suggest a retrial as a possibility Raven123 Jul 2025 #20

The article is wrong. onenote Jul 2025 #22

Thanks again Raven123 Jul 2025 #34

None of the "John's" have ever been charged. JanMichael Jul 2025 #23

Would you trust her not to name folks Trump doesn't like as a way of currying favor with him? onenote Jul 2025 #24

I am sure there is some sort of evidence somewhere JanMichael Jul 2025 #25

If she has evidence and it wasn't turned over when she was arrested onenote Jul 2025 #32

The shit is so deep with these people I doubt it matters JanMichael Jul 2025 #35

A bunch of this bullshit babble in the media and the Orange Sexpest will use RockRaven Jul 2025 #26

dead woman walking says what? lapfog_1 Jul 2025 #28

Did Trump give her an opening? bucolic_frolic Jul 2025 #29

Even if he did, it has nothing to do with her pending appeal and the filing that the government will make tomorrow. onenote Jul 2025 #33

imagine what that gal knows Skittles Jul 2025 #31

What happens when they go into discovery? Baitball Blogger Jul 2025 #38

There isn't going to be discovery. She isn't seeking a new trial. onenote Jul 2025 #39

Thank you. Baitball Blogger Jul 2025 #40