The victims were children and no one should lose sight of that

[niyad]

30. He was found liable for assault, and the judge stated that it actually WAS RAPE,

but the NY statute defines it only with penile penetration.

Your posted defense of this entitled and busy and boastful sexual predator is disturbing, to say the least. And please do not try to split hairs about legal definitions. We are not a
court of law. We all know exactly who, and what, he is, whatever definitions are used, just as we do his supporters, whatever linguistic games they play.