Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
31. She did no such thing.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 06:37 PM
Dec 2012
Transcript of Pelosi Press Conference Today

Q: Madam Leader, the President has already offered to raise his threshold to $400,000. He has said he would commit to $400 billion over 10 years in cuts to Medicare and health care. He has also agreed to the chained CPI. Can you support those concessions, and how much further could the President go to try to get a deal with Speaker Boehner?

Leader Pelosi. Well, first of all, let me just make clear to everyone what the President did say about the $400,000. It was just on rates, it was just on rates, and it didn't apply to deductions or other tax considerations up to $400,000, so what he was conceding on was about $50 billion, about $50 billion, as compared to what the Republicans are doing with this bill, which is closer to $500 billion in terms of lost revenue. So, the President, yes, he did say he would do that.

The cuts, he has always talked about that; he has always talked about that. In regard to – and I think there are ways to do that, and one of the places you can go and get a big chunk of money is to – the cost of drugs in our system. We know that the President has in his budget over $100 billion – is it $130 billion in the budget? I don't know what the net of that is, but it is a big, a great deal of savings. So, yes, you can put that kind of, those kinds of savings together there.

On the CPI, chained CPI, if – and we have had this conversation, too. What we have said, any consideration cannot harm the poor and beneficiaries. So where are the vulnerabilities there? With people on SSI, they would have to be protected, with people who have received Social Security for at least 20 years, people like 85 years old, where savings start to fade, you would have to mitigate for the change at that point. And then there are people that are really poor, because your Social Security is tied to your wages, as you well know, and so you would have to mitigate there in the middle. So how much do you save by the time you mitigate for SSI, people with disabilities, poor people, and really older, much older people? With all of these things, as I said with the age, how much do you really – but if there are some savings that do not harm people who are in need, then that is something to look at, but we are actually looking at the bigger picture. It doesn't mean you subscribe to everything within it, and certainly my colleagues are not happy with the chained CPI, but if we were very happy with the proposal that the President put forth, I am not sure it would have much of a chance on the Republican side. So it is a compromise, and I salute the President for his trying to find a middle ground, even more, making another step to find a solution, but this is within range, you know, in terms of the – before the silliness that started with the million dollar proposal, there was a place to negotiate on this in terms of spending cuts, in terms of reviewing items like chained CPI, in terms of revenue, and let's hope that whatever happens on the floor – it is interesting, do you know how many times what has come to the floor has changed since yesterday? I don't know if you were here last night. Over and over and over again, a different version of the story was coming out of the Rules Committee, and the one that surprised me the least was when they pulled the 250 [thousand] and above, because I knew if they brought that to the floor, it could win.
http://www.democraticleader.gov/Pelosi_Press_Conference_on_Boehner_Plan_B

Why do people feel the need to distort this and keep pushing something that is no longer on the table?

The President is making an announcement shortly.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh no! The republicans must work with us. We do not have to cower to them! The Wielding Truth Dec 2012 #1
cower not cowl Liberal In Texas Dec 2012 #49
Oops, thanks. The Wielding Truth Dec 2012 #51
Maybe he'll throw disabled and unemployed on the table leftstreet Dec 2012 #2
+1 lobezen Dec 2012 #22
They are already on the table. The Chained CPI will affect everyone's sabrina 1 Dec 2012 #53
I suppose when an even worse piece of crap is passed, with pretty much everything djean111 Dec 2012 #3
Idiots DJ13 Dec 2012 #4
I thought all the republicans went home for Christmas. sadbear Dec 2012 #5
What I think will happen is the Dems will use the time off to renegotiate with themselves. djean111 Dec 2012 #8
Not according to the WH: ProSense Dec 2012 #6
Not too bad. JEB Dec 2012 #34
I believe they removed those some time back. /nt Marr Dec 2012 #47
Can someone post an actual transcript? The Daily Kos people tend to freak out geek tragedy Dec 2012 #7
I've been searching for it but haven't found one yet. Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #15
Still no transcript but here is what he said on Ed last night... Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #20
That's much different than what the Dkos statement was. geek tragedy Dec 2012 #21
Obama's offer includeds chained CPI... but I know what you mean. So far I can't find the video Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #23
Eliminate the SS CAP. Return the top tax rates to 90%. Make the Corporations pay at least Vincardog Dec 2012 #9
So obvious, isn't it? cui bono Dec 2012 #13
Why? Because they are bought and paid for by the same interests that own the GOP. Vincardog Dec 2012 #17
Yeah, that's what I was getting at. cui bono Dec 2012 #18
That's it in a Nutshell Liberal1975 Dec 2012 #27
Long past due. JEB Dec 2012 #28
With Dems as friends theaocp Dec 2012 #10
And Boner said Obama isn't being serious Dirty Socialist Dec 2012 #11
Fucking traitors. forestpath Dec 2012 #12
Van Hollen needs to talk to the WH bigtree Dec 2012 #14
I'm asking the same question leftynyc Dec 2012 #16
It's not even like I'd necessarily disagree with the Kos post bigtree Dec 2012 #19
It's an important point here leftynyc Dec 2012 #45
I swear the Democrats could negotiate their way out of winning the lottery... lobezen Dec 2012 #24
They have a LOT of skill. Marr Dec 2012 #48
"We're so close. i just *know* we can show them they can trust us." MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #25
Pelosi urges cuts to Social Security.... Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #26
Fuck this shit. JEB Dec 2012 #29
She did no such thing. ProSense Dec 2012 #31
Yes she did. Your link is from yesterday. They had another press conference today at 1:00 PM EST. Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #39
She still didn't say it: ProSense Dec 2012 #40
Yes she did. Luminous Animal Dec 2012 #41
That's not "urges cuts to Social Security...." She ProSense Dec 2012 #42
I urge Pelosi to resign. Fuddnik Dec 2012 #32
Speculative outrage is the best outrage...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #30
Of course it is, since it won't effect you at all. Fuddnik Dec 2012 #33
Exactly...Canada is a different country. So...it's interesting that this Canadian KoKo Dec 2012 #44
Theres conflicting information iandhr Dec 2012 #35
I thought JEB Dec 2012 #36
Bipartisan is another word for dealing with the devil. FiveGoodMen Dec 2012 #37
POTUS needs to learn to stop bidding against himself Myrina Dec 2012 #38
President Obama gives Away and Away...because he believes in this: KoKo Dec 2012 #43
What happened to "I will not negotiate with myself"? Marr Dec 2012 #46
1979 is the frickin starting point. We ain't buying the bullshit Nancy. mick063 Dec 2012 #50
Checkmate! Doctor_J Dec 2012 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House Democratic leadersh...»Reply #31