Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,000 posts)
14. Deadline: Legal Blog--Judges deem Trump motions to unseal Epstein, Maxwell grand jury transcripts inadequate
Wed Jul 23, 2025, 08:33 PM
Jul 2025

There are statutory requirements for release of grand jury material. The trump motion did NOT pretend to address these requirements or meet requirements such as notifying the victims. The motion filed was so deficient that it has to be refiled

But the judges gave the Trump DOJ the chance to do better by July 29. Maxwell, an Epstein representative and the victims can weigh in, too.

Judges deem Trump motions to unseal Epstein and Maxwell grand jury transcripts inadequate share.google/zSxZZcvYbSRb...

SherryRN @pissedoffnurse (@sherryll.bsky.social) 2025-07-23T18:31:37.090Z

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/epstein-grand-jury-transcripts-maxwell-trump-motions-judges-rcna220298

Two federal judges sent a message to the Trump administration about its attempt to unseal grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell: Try again.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche had filed unsealing motions on both the Epstein and Maxwell dockets amid the political backlash President Donald Trump has faced for his administration’s refusal to make public all Epstein-related materials as promised......

The orders sending Blanche back to the drawing board on Tuesday came from U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer, an Obama appointee who’s presiding over the Maxwell docket, and U.S. District Judge Richard Berman, a Clinton appointee who’s handling the Epstein docket. Both judges are in the Southern District of New York, where Maxwell and Epstein were charged. The orders are similarly worded; you can read the Maxwell one here and the Epstein one here.

Both orders say that the judges intend to resolve the unsealing motions “expeditiously” but that Blanche’s filings were inadequate. The judges gave the DOJ a week, until July 29, to file a more detailed memorandum making the case for unsealing.

Among other things, the judges said the DOJ has to say in the memorandum whether it reviewed the grand jury transcripts in question before making the requests and whether victims were notified.

Both judges were pissed at the crappy job done by the DOJ. Here are links to the two orders
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.789.0.pdf
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.518649/gov.uscourts.nysd.518649.63.0.pdf

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why is this a good thing? Think. Again. Jul 2025 #1
Because UTUSN Jul 2025 #2
Okay. Let's hope someone, somewhere, has the entire dossier and puts it the hands of EVERY journalist out there. Think. Again. Jul 2025 #3
There isn't a "dossier." Tons of stuff is scattered out there. UTUSN Jul 2025 #9
I suspect that more than a few legal eagles, agencies, investigators, journalists, and individuals.... Think. Again. Jul 2025 #12
Somehow, this is all Merrick Garland's fault Fiendish Thingy Jul 2025 #4
Or it could have been The Clenis. madinmaryland Jul 2025 #8
Thanks, Obama!!! hatrack Jul 2025 #11
Nice post, ..... madinmaryland Jul 2025 #19
Victims safety Gregory1230 Jul 2025 #5
The link states the judge's legal basis, UTUSN Jul 2025 #6
This should have been a foregone conclusion Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #7
We knew, the judge knew, KRASNOV's DOJ knew - well maybe KRASNOV doesn't... UTUSN Jul 2025 #10
If evidence that proves child-rape is in those documents, it does rise to that threshold. Think. Again. Jul 2025 #13
Not really close. Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #15
Yes, a judicial proceeding involving the prosecution of child-rapists. Think. Again. Jul 2025 #16
And what judicial proceeding is going on now involving prosecution of child rapists? Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #17
I agree with you... Think. Again. Jul 2025 #18
Deadline: Legal Blog--Judges deem Trump motions to unseal Epstein, Maxwell grand jury transcripts inadequate LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2025 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Go, judges on a roll! - D...»Reply #14