Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why is this a good thing? Think. Again. Jul 2025 #1
Because UTUSN Jul 2025 #2
Okay. Let's hope someone, somewhere, has the entire dossier and puts it the hands of EVERY journalist out there. Think. Again. Jul 2025 #3
There isn't a "dossier." Tons of stuff is scattered out there. UTUSN Jul 2025 #9
I suspect that more than a few legal eagles, agencies, investigators, journalists, and individuals.... Think. Again. Jul 2025 #12
Somehow, this is all Merrick Garland's fault Fiendish Thingy Jul 2025 #4
Or it could have been The Clenis. madinmaryland Jul 2025 #8
Thanks, Obama!!! hatrack Jul 2025 #11
Nice post, ..... madinmaryland Jul 2025 #19
Victims safety Gregory1230 Jul 2025 #5
The link states the judge's legal basis, UTUSN Jul 2025 #6
This should have been a foregone conclusion Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #7
We knew, the judge knew, KRASNOV's DOJ knew - well maybe KRASNOV doesn't... UTUSN Jul 2025 #10
If evidence that proves child-rape is in those documents, it does rise to that threshold. Think. Again. Jul 2025 #13
Not really close. Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #15
Yes, a judicial proceeding involving the prosecution of child-rapists. Think. Again. Jul 2025 #16
And what judicial proceeding is going on now involving prosecution of child rapists? Wiz Imp Jul 2025 #17
I agree with you... Think. Again. Jul 2025 #18
Deadline: Legal Blog--Judges deem Trump motions to unseal Epstein, Maxwell grand jury transcripts inadequate LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2025 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Go, judges on a roll! - D...»Reply #19