General Discussion

bvar22

(39,909 posts)

10. You say you play Chess,

Fri Dec 21, 2012, 06:53 PM

Dec 2012

...and have NEVER sacrificed a Pawn?

Next Question:
have you ever WON?
...because if you NEVER sacrifice a Pawn, you would be laughably easy to beat.

The GREAT players like Bobby Fischer sacrifice Pawns.... all the time.

"Thinking along the same lines to accomplish the goal Fischer was aiming at: to dominate the dark squares and flow in pieces, sacrificing material to do it, knowing well the material will be regained once the pieces are on the right squares. Much like Bobby Fischer, computers dominate the chess world today and chess players study them, and are beginning to think like them. Computers don't have fear, they don't have "conventional wisdom" and they don't worry about sacrificing pawns to flow pieces into squares. They have no emotional attachment to pieces."

http://poloniachessclub.blogspot.com/2011/04/chess-bobby-fischer.html

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Chess? [View all] bvar22 Dec 2012 OP

Is that an image of the evil Obama? ProSense Dec 2012 #1

Well, you know... you just can't trust "their kind" n/t Scootaloo Dec 2012 #4

No. That wasn't posted as an image of our President. bvar22 Dec 2012 #9

This message was self-deleted by its author cliffordu Dec 2012 #20

Checkers slackmaster Dec 2012 #2

CHECKMATE leftstreet Dec 2012 #3

K&R forestpath Dec 2012 #5

... Tx4obama Dec 2012 #6

An oldie, but a goodie. Egalitarian Thug Dec 2012 #7

As a chess player, I NEVER sacrifice pawns..... lastlib Dec 2012 #8

You say you play Chess, bvar22 Dec 2012 #10

can't say I haven't made mistakes and lost a few, but never DELIBERATELY just give one away.... lastlib Dec 2012 #15

"just giving one away" is NOT a "Sacrifice", bvar22 Dec 2012 #22

You clearly have no idea how chess is actually played. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #11

Gish Gallop Nonsense. bvar22 Dec 2012 #12

The fact that you do not (can not) understand chess, does not make it a "Gish Gallop" event. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #13

Hey, Joe Philly.... bvar22 Dec 2012 #17

Of course, I'd exchange the pawn for the win, but that's not a true "sacrifice." lastlib Dec 2012 #16

I'd love to play a game of chess with you. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #18

okay I just won a game of chess against level 8 on the computer hfojvt Dec 2012 #32

So what you just explained is a computer program that appears to make decisions JoePhilly Dec 2012 #34

That is close enough for the OP to be a valid statement. bvar22 Dec 2012 #19

Hey guy? Your large bold type makes me instantly skip over everything you post. Chorophyll Dec 2012 #28

I really don't care what you "skip over". bvar22 Dec 2012 #29

The substance of your post, such as it was, was lost in your screaming. Chorophyll Dec 2012 #30

When dealing with the impaired, bvar22 Dec 2012 #33

lol. Bobby Fischer is that you???? JoePhilly Dec 2012 #35

Bobby Fischer? bvar22 Dec 2012 #36

Which is why I asked if you were he. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #37

No. You ARE distorting what I said in my OP. bvar22 Dec 2012 #38

Did you really say that????? 99Forever Dec 2012 #40

No sarcasm was needed. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #41

Oh please. 99Forever Dec 2012 #43

Perhaps you should learn the game DevonRex Dec 2012 #14

Can you explain why the Pawns are in the front rank and not the Royalty bahrbearian Dec 2012 #23

Because Obama hates them. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #42

Chess!! cliffordu Dec 2012 #21

That's not the aspect being referred to when people use the expression treestar Dec 2012 #24

I wonder if in 2014 bahrbearian Dec 2012 #25

You and I are not in the big club pokerfan Dec 2012 #26

Perhaps an even larger font would be more convincing? Robb Dec 2012 #27

These politician are not playing games. Autumn Dec 2012 #31

That's all that needed to be said, but I'm sure the multidimensional brainfucking will continue. adirondacker Dec 2012 #39