General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What kind of iirresponsible idiot was Merrick Garland? [View all]Fiendish Thingy
(23,380 posts)OK, so there were four prosecutors
along with a team of investigators and field agents and lower level DOJ lawyers, who worked to indict and convict over a thousand J6 insurrectionists, as well as gather data on Trumps role.
Many Garland bashers conveniently ignore the numerous obstacles encountered-
Executive privilege claims (which Garlands team finally defeated, getting a favorable ruling from SCOTUS in January 2023, IIRC. That opened the floodgates for subpeonas and getting testimony from crucial witnesses, like Pences chief of staff.
Claims of attorney client privilege- there were something like 40 lawyers involved or at least within the orbit of Trumps J6 conspiracy, from John Eastman and Rudy to all of Trumps personal and presidential lawyers. None could be interviewed until the privilege question was resolved, IIRC, in late 2023.
So, critical evidence in the form of those involved with Trump in the conspiracy was largely unavailable for 2+ years after the insurrection. Thats a HUGE reason why Garland couldnt get an indictment against Trump sooner. I mean he could have rushed the it was all on national TV evidence and delivered it to a grand jury, who, on the judges instructions on the legally required elements that must be present in order to indict (intent, conspiracy, attempt to defraud), would have returned a no bill (no indictment).
Think about all the testimony we heard from the J6 committee witnesses detailing events and conversations on that day- none of that testimony was available for two years or more, and couldnt be presented to a grand jury. Most of Those witnesses were also deposed by Garlands, and then Smiths teams, but not until the privilege claims were resolved.
Obstruction from within the DOJ/FBI - the WaPo article you reference also confirms that Garland proceeded with investigations into Trumps crimes as soon as he was sworn in despite active resistance and interference from pro-Trump career employees at both agencies.
And then, there were all the delays encountered from the courts, especially SCOTUS.
It was all on National TV is a naive perspective likely formed from an incomplete knowledge and understanding of the facts.