Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
"YLS never beating the 'they don't teach law at Yale' allegations" [View all]
Anna Bower
@annabower.bsky.social
Follow
YLS never beating the “they don’t teach law at Yale” allegations
JD Vance &
@JDVance
The contention--which is pretty clear if you just read what I said--is that it's bogus for the WSJ to publish a hit piece without showing us the letter.
I have no idea if the book exists--WSJ won't show it to us. I have no idea if the letter exists--WSJ won't show it to us. What I find absurd is the idea that Donald Trump was writing poems to Epstein, and I find it equally absurd that a major American paper would attack the President of the United States without revealing the basis for the attack.
We all know what's going to happen. They're going to dribble little details out for days or weeks in an effort to assassinate the president's character.
They won't show us this book or allow us to refute it until they've wrung every bit of fake news out of the story. And everyone will just move on from the fact that the WSJ is acting like a Democrat SuperPAC. It's disgraceful, and it's why the president sued.
ALT
July 25, 2025 at 3:06 PM
@annabower.bsky.social
Follow
YLS never beating the “they don’t teach law at Yale” allegations
JD Vance &
@JDVance
The contention--which is pretty clear if you just read what I said--is that it's bogus for the WSJ to publish a hit piece without showing us the letter.
I have no idea if the book exists--WSJ won't show it to us. I have no idea if the letter exists--WSJ won't show it to us. What I find absurd is the idea that Donald Trump was writing poems to Epstein, and I find it equally absurd that a major American paper would attack the President of the United States without revealing the basis for the attack.
We all know what's going to happen. They're going to dribble little details out for days or weeks in an effort to assassinate the president's character.
They won't show us this book or allow us to refute it until they've wrung every bit of fake news out of the story. And everyone will just move on from the fact that the WSJ is acting like a Democrat SuperPAC. It's disgraceful, and it's why the president sued.
ALT
July 25, 2025 at 3:06 PM
YLS never beating the “they don’t teach law at Yale†allegations
— Anna Bower (@annabower.bsky.social) 2025-07-25T19:06:51.115Z
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read