Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Chess? [View all]

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
17. Hey, Joe Philly....
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:30 PM
Dec 2012

[font size=4]
Everybody who has ever played Chess HAS indeed Sacrificed a Pawn to protect their Royalty.[/font]


Will you try to dispute the above claim?
You "claim" to be knowledgeable about the game of Chess.
Have you NEVER sacrificed a Pawn?

What made you response Gish Gallop was the failed attempt to dilute the the OP by dumping non relevant information into the dialog.

I stand by the OP:
[font size=4] Chess IS a game where Pawns are sacrificed to protect the Royalty.[/font]

THAT is a valid description of the game,
and occurs routinely in almost EVERY game of Chess.

Anybody who is reading this thread can check this out themselves by looking up the definition and etymology of the term "Sacrificial Pawn",
or by picking up a book of Beginning Chess where the Sacrificial Pawn WILL be discusses in the first few chapters,

OR

they can believe your claim that Pawns are NEVER sacrificed to protect the Royalty in the Game of Chess.


"In chess, a sacrifice is a move giving up a piece in the hopes of gaining tactical or positional compensation in other forms. A sacrifice could also be a deliberate exchange of a chess piece of higher value for an opponent's piece of lower value."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacrifice_%28chess%29

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Chess? [View all] bvar22 Dec 2012 OP
Is that an image of the evil Obama? ProSense Dec 2012 #1
Well, you know... you just can't trust "their kind" n/t Scootaloo Dec 2012 #4
No. That wasn't posted as an image of our President. bvar22 Dec 2012 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author cliffordu Dec 2012 #20
Checkers slackmaster Dec 2012 #2
CHECKMATE leftstreet Dec 2012 #3
K&R forestpath Dec 2012 #5
... Tx4obama Dec 2012 #6
An oldie, but a goodie. Egalitarian Thug Dec 2012 #7
As a chess player, I NEVER sacrifice pawns..... lastlib Dec 2012 #8
You say you play Chess, bvar22 Dec 2012 #10
can't say I haven't made mistakes and lost a few, but never DELIBERATELY just give one away.... lastlib Dec 2012 #15
"just giving one away" is NOT a "Sacrifice", bvar22 Dec 2012 #22
You clearly have no idea how chess is actually played. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #11
Gish Gallop Nonsense. bvar22 Dec 2012 #12
The fact that you do not (can not) understand chess, does not make it a "Gish Gallop" event. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #13
Hey, Joe Philly.... bvar22 Dec 2012 #17
Of course, I'd exchange the pawn for the win, but that's not a true "sacrifice." lastlib Dec 2012 #16
I'd love to play a game of chess with you. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #18
okay I just won a game of chess against level 8 on the computer hfojvt Dec 2012 #32
So what you just explained is a computer program that appears to make decisions JoePhilly Dec 2012 #34
That is close enough for the OP to be a valid statement. bvar22 Dec 2012 #19
Hey guy? Your large bold type makes me instantly skip over everything you post. Chorophyll Dec 2012 #28
I really don't care what you "skip over". bvar22 Dec 2012 #29
The substance of your post, such as it was, was lost in your screaming. Chorophyll Dec 2012 #30
When dealing with the impaired, bvar22 Dec 2012 #33
lol. Bobby Fischer is that you???? JoePhilly Dec 2012 #35
Bobby Fischer? bvar22 Dec 2012 #36
Which is why I asked if you were he. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #37
No. You ARE distorting what I said in my OP. bvar22 Dec 2012 #38
Did you really say that????? 99Forever Dec 2012 #40
No sarcasm was needed. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #41
Oh please. 99Forever Dec 2012 #43
Perhaps you should learn the game DevonRex Dec 2012 #14
Can you explain why the Pawns are in the front rank and not the Royalty bahrbearian Dec 2012 #23
Because Obama hates them. JoePhilly Dec 2012 #42
Chess!! cliffordu Dec 2012 #21
That's not the aspect being referred to when people use the expression treestar Dec 2012 #24
I wonder if in 2014 bahrbearian Dec 2012 #25
You and I are not in the big club pokerfan Dec 2012 #26
Perhaps an even larger font would be more convincing? Robb Dec 2012 #27
These politician are not playing games. Autumn Dec 2012 #31
That's all that needed to be said, but I'm sure the multidimensional brainfucking will continue. adirondacker Dec 2012 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chess?»Reply #17