Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

muriel_volestrangler

(106,600 posts)

13. The irony of your attempt to spin this against the reality is quite hilarious

Reply to GreatGazoo (Reply #11)

Wed Jul 30, 2025, 05:56 PM

Jul 2025

Comic thread is comic.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Is So Much of What We Call "History" Wrong? [View all] GreatGazoo Jul 2025 OP

The "winners" write it. H2O Man Jul 2025 #1

This NewHendoLib Jul 2025 #2

That, and the fact that most people don't give a damn thucythucy Jul 2025 #4

"How much do we devote, yearly, to the preservation..."? Billions of $$$ GreatGazoo Jul 2025 #7

I specifically tried to exclude tourism and tourist attractions, thucythucy Jul 2025 #15

I hear you on NFL expenses vs history preservation GreatGazoo Jul 2025 #17

I agree that the study of history has and is making great strides. thucythucy Aug 2025 #33

Americans are more interested in science fiction than history. thought crime Jul 2025 #18

That simple malaise Jul 2025 #8

Not always TnDem Jul 2025 #12

But which "holy" texts were chosen to be included in the Bible, Aristus Jul 2025 #16

The Bible isn't history. thought crime Jul 2025 #19

"Nobody reads anymore." Kid Berwyn Jul 2025 #27

;--{) Goonch Jul 2025 #28

Countering Criticism of the Warren Report (CIA, PDF) Kid Berwyn Jul 2025 #29

There are no facts. Only interpretations. Friedrich Nietzsche Ping Tung Jul 2025 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author thought crime Jul 2025 #20

To a certain degree it can only be an art ITAL Jul 2025 #5

"Why it happened" is much more debatable than 'What happened' GreatGazoo Jul 2025 #6

Nice OP malaise Jul 2025 #9

Ironically, your version of the scan of Shakespeare's grave is completely wrong muriel_volestrangler Jul 2025 #10

GPR shows no skull, no casket or coffin, not even nails from a rotted coffin. GreatGazoo Jul 2025 #11

The irony of your attempt to spin this against the reality is quite hilarious muriel_volestrangler Jul 2025 #13

I cited the Shakespeare myth specifically for the dynamic you are helping to illustrate GreatGazoo Jul 2025 #14

Sure, go on denying what the people who did the scan said, if it makes you feel OK muriel_volestrangler Jul 2025 #22

Kevin Colls says there is no skull under that stone and no coffin GreatGazoo Jul 2025 #23

So we've gone from "Shakespeare isn't buried there. It's empty" to 5, including him, buried in shallow graves in shrouds muriel_volestrangler Jul 2025 #24

According to Colls and science, Is Shakespeare's skull in that infant-sized "grave"? Yes or No GreatGazoo Jul 2025 #25

They don't know if the skull is in there or not, but the grave is not "infant-sized" muriel_volestrangler Jul 2025 #30

"It's very very convincing to me that his skull isn't at Holy Trinity at all." - Colls GreatGazoo Aug 2025 #31

In your arguments in this thread, you have said: muriel_volestrangler Aug 2025 #32

SInce you mentioned "Gilgamesh", I'll leave you this historical tidbit: Gilgamesh gave birth to Hamas. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Jul 2025 #21

Well said! nt intrepidity Jul 2025 #26

It is manipulated thru time to say what one wants republianmushroom Aug 2025 #34