Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
44. Look
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:38 PM
Dec 2012
By repeatedly validating Republican lies and talking points on SS and austerity,

Obama has guaranteed that we will be fighting this battle for years to come. What used to be understood as merely Republican talking points are now a malignant bipartisan narrative.

It is a devastating betrayal.

...this battle has been fought ever since Social Security was enacted. It's not new.

A Democratic President enacted the COLA. Everything objectionable, including linking Social Security to the general fund, was part of that proposal.

President Jimmy Carter

<...>

While campaigning for President, I stressed my commitment to restore the financial integrity of the Social Security system. I pledged I would do my best to avoid increases above those already scheduled in tax rates, which fall most heavily on moderate and lower-income workers. I also promised to correct the technical flaw in the system which exaggerates the adjustment for inflation, and to do so without reducing the relative value of retirement benefits as compared with pre-retirement earnings.

I am announcing today a set of proposals which meet those commitments and which solve both the short-term and long-term problems in the Social Security system through the end of the twentieth century. These proposals are designed to:

--Prevent the default of the trust funds now predicted to occur.

--Bring income and expenses into balance in 1978 and keep them that way through the end of the century.

--Create sufficient reserves to protect the system against sudden declines in revenue caused by unemployment or other economic uncertainties.

--Protect the system's integrity beyond the turn of the century to the extent we can predict what will happen in the next 75 years.

--Provide for an orderly review and examination of the system's basic structure.

My proposals are the result of a number of hard choices. I am convinced that action is needed now, and that these steps will restore the financial integrity of the Social Security system.

I will ask the Congress to take the following specific actions:

1. Compensate the Social Security trust funds from general revenues for a share of revenues lost during severe recessions. General revenues would be used in a counter-cyclical fashion to replace the payroll tax receipts lost as a result of that portion of unemployment in excess of six percent. General revenues would be used only in these carefully limited situations. Because this is an innovative measure, the legislation we submit will provide this feature only through 1982. The next Social Security Advisory Council will be asked to review this counter-cyclical mechanism to determine whether it should be made permanent.

2. Remove the wage-base ceiling for employers. Under present law employers and employees pay a tax only on the first $16,500 in wages. Under this proposal the employer ceiling would be raised over a three-year period, so that by 1981 the ceiling would be removed. This action will provide a significant source of revenue without increasing long-term benefit liabilities.

3. Increase the wage base subject to the employee tax by $600 in 1979, 1981, 1983, and 1985, beyond the automatic increases in current law. This will provide a progressive source of financing.

4. Shift revenues from the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund to the Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Trust Funds. In part, this shift will be made possible because of substantial savings to the Medicare system from the hospital cost containment legislation that I have proposed.

5. Increase the tax rate on the self-employed from 7 percent to 7.5 percent. This will restore the historical relationship between the OASI and the DI rates paid by the self-employed to one and one-half times that paid by employees.

6. Correct certain technical provisions of the Social Security Act which differentiate on the basis of sex. This will include a new eligibility test for dependent benefits. Recent Supreme Court decisions would result in un-financed increases in the cost of the system and some inequities without this change.

These six steps, along with measures already contained in existing law, will eliminate the short-term financing problem and improve the overall equity of the Social Security system.

In order to guarantee the financial integrity of the system into the next century, two additional steps must be taken. I will be asking the Congress to:

1. Modify the Social Security benefit formula to eliminate the inflation over-adjustment now in law. This modification, known as "decoupling," should be done in a way that maintains the current ratio of retirement benefits to pre-retirement wages.

2. Adjust the timing of a tax rate increase already contained in current law. The one percent tax rate increase presently scheduled for the year 2011 would be moved forward so that .25 percent would occur in 1985 and the remainder in 1990.

Taken together, the actions I am recommending today will eliminate the Social Security deficit for the remainder of this century. They mill reduce the estimated 75-year deficit from the Trustee Report forecast of 8.2 percent of payroll to a manageable 1.9 percent.

Prompt enactment of the measure I have recommended will provide the Social Security system with financial stability. This is an overriding immediate objective.

In addition, I am instructing the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare to appoint the independent Social Security Advisory Council required by law to meet each four years. I will ask the Council to conduct a thorough reexamination of the structure of the system, the adequacy of its benefits, the effectiveness and equity of disability definitions, and the efficiency and responsiveness of its administration. Their report, which will be issued within the next two years, will provide the basis for further improvements.

I call upon the Congress to act favorably on these major reform initiatives.

Jimmy Carter

The White House,

May 9, 1977.

http://www.ssa.gov/history/carterstmts.html#system


Fact, the current COLA is inadequate:

Even Social Security’s current cost-of-living adjustment understates the true impact of inflation on elderly recipients, who spend far more on health care than anyone else – including annual increases in Medicare premiums.

http://robertreich.org/post/38349329185


Noise without facts is noise. Work to reject attempts to cut the program and demand that it be expanded and strengthened.

The current drama helped to deliver a blow to one of the disguised cuts, and that's a good thing.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The GOP is playing (badly) poker a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #1
The GOP is playing poke the bear. And they just got a chunk of ass chewed off. nt Xipe Totec Dec 2012 #2
I expected the GOP to go down a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #3
Then Mr. Cool gets on tv and says 'United we stand; Divided we fall.' It was a thing of beauty. Gregorian Dec 2012 #4
Yes! An admission by the author of CPI that it hurts the poorer and older ones the most. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #5
Not True...President Obama put it ON THE TABLE...it won't leave... KoKo Dec 2012 #6
It's gone: ProSense Dec 2012 #9
It's not gone....wait and see the NEW YEAR! President made it a bargaining chip... KoKo Dec 2012 #10
Nope, it's gone ProSense Dec 2012 #11
You have posted nothing that shows SS is off the table. woo me with science Dec 2012 #15
Why are you panicking? It's gone ProSense Dec 2012 #19
Where did the President state that SS is off the table? woo me with science Dec 2012 #24
Wow, you're really taking this hard, huh? ProSense Dec 2012 #26
What offer? woo me with science Dec 2012 #29
It's invisible to you. n/t ProSense Dec 2012 #30
Apparently it's so invisible you can't post it. woo me with science Dec 2012 #32
You're right. Please proceed. n/t ProSense Dec 2012 #35
Kicking the can down the road, and making jokes. woo me with science Dec 2012 #46
You forgot that I'm immune to your tired spin. n/t ProSense Dec 2012 #54
There is nothing in that statement that takes SS off the table... rateyes Dec 2012 #53
The President's statements in the video are clear, but there is nothing in your link woo me with science Dec 2012 #16
republicans are so stupid. Obama could promise to step down and take his entire cabinet with him... spanone Dec 2012 #7
. ProSense Dec 2012 #8
Mustn't hurt the poor widdle misunderstood, Cha Dec 2012 #42
Is anything on the table? dkf Dec 2012 #12
Yes: ProSense Dec 2012 #14
Well it looks like Obama is at the table by himself. dkf Dec 2012 #21
No it isn't. woo me with science Dec 2012 #13
Obama Drops the Hammer on Republicans and Pulls Back His Last Fiscal Cliff Proposal ProSense Dec 2012 #17
Then why didn't the President fight austerity instead of colluding woo me with science Dec 2012 #20
My hero Howard Dean. Sigh. dkf Dec 2012 #22
Well, Obama did not mention c-cpi directly in the latest 'deal' however TheProgressive Dec 2012 #18
Well, ProSense Dec 2012 #25
Sorry ProSense, I do not share your absolute conviction that it is off the table... TheProgressive Dec 2012 #27
There is nothing ProSense Dec 2012 #34
In all truth, I hope you are correct. TheProgressive Dec 2012 #37
Imagine that. Just like it was never really there. Hekate Dec 2012 #23
Sorry, but thanks to Obama it will NEVER be off the table (nt) Demo_Chris Dec 2012 #28
Oh, welcome to DU...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #33
Yes. By repeatedly validating Republican lies and talking points on SS and austerity, woo me with science Dec 2012 #39
Look ProSense Dec 2012 #44
That's some serious audacity there. woo me with science Dec 2012 #55
That's me: audacious. ProSense Dec 2012 #57
"It's an ongoing struggle," says the orphan looking for sympathy woo me with science Dec 2012 #58
Looking for an easy life? ProSense Dec 2012 #59
No, he never said this is over, woo me with science Dec 2012 #60
Since you're having a hard time ProSense Dec 2012 #61
Answer: Obama doesn't want to cut SS... SidDithers Dec 2012 #31
Then why did he say that he thinks it should be cut? MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #41
^^^ this ^^^ TDale313 Dec 2012 #45
I'm losing track, Manny. Was it 22% that he wanted, or 10%, like you posted earlier this week...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #62
Show us the quote, Sid. nt MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #63
... SidDithers Dec 2012 #64
OK. And in what way are these contradictory or otherwise incorrect? nt MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #65
no it's not. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #36
Sadly, I don't think that will last long MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #38
It'll never be off the table for some, but ProSense Dec 2012 #47
I expect it will turn up again in the next month. MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #48
It'll never get through the Senate ProSense Dec 2012 #50
I hope that you're right nt MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #51
And on to a very conveniently located, well-lit side table. nt Bonobo Dec 2012 #40
I can't speak for anyone else, it was a long week. Lone_Star_Dem Dec 2012 #43
..... for now DJ13 Dec 2012 #49
The "worst aspects" for everyone ProSense Dec 2012 #52
I'm right there with you on that DJ13 Dec 2012 #56
When was the last time you heard... Demo_Chris Dec 2012 #66
Not how I read what he said today: grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #67
No, ProSense Dec 2012 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After a dramatic week, So...»Reply #44