General Discussion

SocialDemocrat61

(7,463 posts)

41. Not personally offended

Sat Aug 2, 2025, 07:11 PM

Aug 2025

but think it was very tone deaf on the part of the company and their advertising agency. However, I do know some who are offended and understand their reasons.
What I find worrying is the history from Nazi Germany. When the Nazis took over the country they started to infuse their ideology into all communications, into newspapers, radio programs (news and entertainment, movies and advertising in both overt and subtly. Is that what’s happening here? I don’t know. It could just be an innocent mistake.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

rollin74 PunkinPi

89 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just want to confirm that no one here is offended by sydney sweeneys jeans ad, right? [View all] dsp3000 Aug 2025 OP

Just a second while I grab my popcorn... n/t SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2025 #1

Nope, not gonna work. Kingofalldems Aug 2025 #3

Not in the slightest iemanja Aug 2025 #2

No idea about any of this. Who? What? NewHendoLib Aug 2025 #4

Not at all. Justice Brandeis Aug 2025 #5

Need a link or an explanation. MuseRider Aug 2025 #6

Oh gods what did I miss now? Hekate Aug 2025 #7

Nope. It's too stupid for words. Pacifist Patriot Aug 2025 #13

Thx for sparing me Hekate Aug 2025 #22

That one transcends stupidity. Pacifist Patriot Aug 2025 #46

Too stupid to recognize the potential for misreading - Ms. Toad Aug 2025 #52

Not offended at all.... anciano Aug 2025 #8

Not offended or outraged, but it's okay to acknowledge that the concept of "good genes" is literally eugenics. WhiskeyGrinder Aug 2025 #9

My daughter has an 95 yo friend who is sharp as a tack and healthy. harumph Aug 2025 #21

Eugenics literally means "good genes" WhiskeyGrinder Aug 2025 #28

That is literally incorrect. harumph Aug 2025 #61

Sure, but there's a context in current events. yardwork Aug 2025 #74

When I say I have "good genes", I mean things like thick hair, longer life span. mucholderthandirt Aug 2025 #75

I went and found it. It wasn't particularly annoying Ritabert Aug 2025 #10

It's good jeans, not blue jeans. Ms. Toad Aug 2025 #67

I honestly do not give a shit about any ads whatsoever. Initech Aug 2025 #11

They've run extensive coverage of it to distract from the Epstein controversy iemanja Aug 2025 #25

Yup, don't give a shit. Initech Aug 2025 #56

THIS right here!! Anything that distracts from the sex crimes of the Pedo-in-Chief is not worth our time. InAbLuEsTaTe Aug 2025 #58

I remember when the jeans ad kerfluffle was Brooke Shields. Calvin Klein? Noodleboy13 Aug 2025 #12

Good recollection. I think the length of her legs . . . John1956PA Aug 2025 #15

Not offended Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2025 #14

Well, do I think USA Gymnastics should be looking into it. GopherGal Aug 2025 #16

I haven't seen anyone on the left including DU talk about the ad itself. Renew Deal Aug 2025 #17

I don't care one way or the other but perhaps you should start out with who the hell is Sydney Sweeney AND hlthe2b Aug 2025 #18

yup Skittles Aug 2025 #19

She's on the HBO series Euphoria Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2025 #54

Okay... thanks for the info... I've never seen it either (and likewise, Barbarella should stay in Jane Fonda's hlthe2b Aug 2025 #55

Euphoria is superb. Zendaya is the biggest star. Celerity Aug 2025 #73

That sounds very unpleasant. hunter Aug 2025 #81

The show is objectively terrible and depressing BannonsLiver Aug 2025 #82

Double meaning re genetics - even racist malaise Aug 2025 #84

No idea what you are posting about. nt mcar Aug 2025 #20

Might be mocking racism and hurt the snowflake drama queens feelings a bit? Brainfodder Aug 2025 #23

Who? uponit7771 Aug 2025 #24

When they find out she's a republican flvegan Aug 2025 #26

I think it's... Mike Nelson Aug 2025 #27

Huh? Scrivener7 Aug 2025 #29

Well, I can't comment because I don't know who Sydney Sweeney is. Polly Hennessey Aug 2025 #30

Here's a SNL she was in SocialDemocrat61 Aug 2025 #43

Do you have a link to the ad? flying rabbit Aug 2025 #31

There was a previous thread on here about this MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2025 #32

I am guessing some phony outrage has been whipped up about something which rurallib Aug 2025 #33

All I know Wifes husband Aug 2025 #34

I'm not in an way religious, but 'Amen.' Xavier Breath Aug 2025 #70

Not outraged but it is kind of gross under this Nazi regime LymphocyteLover Aug 2025 #35

Every time I see one of those dumb-ass red hats I think of eugenics. hay rick Aug 2025 #36

Agree Mossfern Aug 2025 #72

huh? AllaN01Bear Aug 2025 #37

I have no idea who she even is and have never seen the ad, because I either stream shows or record them and Raftergirl Aug 2025 #38

She's an actress SocialDemocrat61 Aug 2025 #42

Distraction by RWers posing as lefties. edbermac Aug 2025 #39

Are you kidding angrychair Aug 2025 #40

Not personally offended SocialDemocrat61 Aug 2025 #41

Someone here at DU posted Desi Lydic's take on the thing. . . Collimator Aug 2025 #44

They think they've found their Pure White Princess. Iggo Aug 2025 #60

Here's the Desi Lydic video SocialDemocrat61 Aug 2025 #64

Not as much as I am by Trump sexually assaulting minors. Iggo Aug 2025 #45

I googled her. Looks like the Brook Shields Calvin Kelin ad in 1980& 81 irisblue Aug 2025 #47

The problem is using a white model accompanied by the words "good jeans" Ms. Toad Aug 2025 #53

That's a stupid ad but yes, it's about eugenics. Dave Bowman Aug 2025 #48

Made up BS - no one cares and never did. These folks are just trying to create false outrage. walkingman Aug 2025 #49

It has been a thing for a while in advertising that even applegrove Aug 2025 #50

I couldn't care less. In It to Win It Aug 2025 #51

No one I know is offended by this Happy Hoosier Aug 2025 #57

It's about as concering as the price of used spit at sea level. Ping Tung Aug 2025 #59

This could rename the streisand effect krawhitham Aug 2025 #62

Who? sakabatou Aug 2025 #63

Astro turf. Ignore it. Best let the right argue alone. Bluesaph Aug 2025 #65

Not offended at all rollin74 Aug 2025 #66

There are a few social media career types JI7 Aug 2025 #68

An interesting view of why the ad is problematic Wiz Imp Aug 2025 #69

The RW's not outraged at the advert. The RW's mocking outrage from the left (outrage I find foolish) in re the advert Celerity Aug 2025 #71

I'm not offended just aware that ads reflect our culture and also enforce hegemony Iris Aug 2025 #76

No. They took a couple of people's takes on Tik Tok and made it into their own thing. underpants Aug 2025 #77

I must be really out of it. I haven't even taken the time to find out who Sydney Sweeney is. LOL. Vinca Aug 2025 #78

I've seen the ad. I'm "offended" by how weird and off-putting it is. Oneironaut Aug 2025 #79

Counterpoint Stargleamer Aug 2025 #80

I would have to see it before we could answer the question sarisataka Aug 2025 #83

Judging by the earlier thread here it does appear some are offended by it IMO EX500rider Aug 2025 #85

It's an ugly ad, IMO. But then I'm old, and don't find her "beautiful" in the slightest. RandomNumbers Aug 2025 #86

Same boat, I find most ads to be obnoxious misanthrope Aug 2025 #87

Not bothered in the least bit by it...I'm shocked it's in the news. Melon Aug 2025 #88

This reply to the ad on YouTube: "Let's not get mad about this. Let's get mad at THE LACK OF THE EPSTEIN FILES" Beartracks Aug 2025 #89