Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PROJECT 2028 FOR DEMOCRATS [View all]Celerity
(54,886 posts)18. The Rethugs have been working towards this since late 1964, after they got smashed by LBJ.
You had the beginning of the rise of the RW Christians as a political force, and the rise of The Southern Strategy sprung to the fore, obsessed with using white grievance culture to pull the old racist, hate-filled Dixiecrat types (and not limited to only those in the deep South, eventually) into the Republican tent. Nixon started in, Reagan really took it to a new national level, and Trump has weaponised them and further radicalised them.
You said:
I refuse to accept that my party is that inept and weak.
That list is mostly blocked by legal/constitutional issues. I do, however, agree that some of the things will likely be stopped by moderate to conservative and/or institutionalist Democrats.
They will likely block (and this is even if we control POTUS, the Senate, and the House):
1. They will likely block SCOTUS expansion (and that thus stops the overturning of Citizens United, plus it means codification of abortion rights will be ruled as unconstitutional, as will a ban on gerrymandering, and The Fairness Doctrine if its extended to cable, satellite, and the internet.
2. Some conservadems will likely not support truly universal healthcare, will not support a 20 USD per hour minimum wage, taxing churches capping CEO pay to 35X lowest paid worker, likely will not support doing away with the filibuster, will not support ranked choice voting, and will not support taxing unrealised gains in many cases.
Multiple other things on the list would require constitutional amendments that will not occur:
Ending the Electoral College
Abortion rights
Term limits for SCOTUS
Mandatory universal Ranked Choice voting
Outlawing gerrymandering
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I desperately hope that members of our party will feel superior in knowing
Jack Valentino
Aug 2025
#6
It's a matter of education - specifically the high schools teaching civics classes
FakeNoose
Aug 2025
#15
Does resisting include downplaying everything he does on a forum aimed at Democrats?
BannonsLiver
Aug 2025
#25
A lot of pie in the sky foolishness that is not realistic or even constitutional n/t
Wanderlust988
Aug 2025
#2
Sadly, that's not a plan, more of a wet-dream wish list, and very little of it is achievable until at least 2029
0rganism
Aug 2025
#7
The only one that could realistically happen is the stock trading ban. Every other item is either not possible without a
Celerity
Aug 2025
#8
The Rethugs have been working towards this since late 1964, after they got smashed by LBJ.
Celerity
Aug 2025
#18
This is not a plan and I don't think that we should look to what is a meme like meant to be viral list as such.
themaguffin
Aug 2025
#11
Gerrymandering is currently being done by Repukes in order to freeze out opposition
FakeNoose
Aug 2025
#20