Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,672 posts)
6. it absolutely is in dispute. Read the Smith report, ffs.
Tue Aug 12, 2025, 09:43 AM
Aug 2025

...it was the courts who delayed the process, not the prosecutors.

I've posted my receipts shorthand here, and you should know well I've posted them longhand. And nothing you've provided here proves a wit of what you wrote about Garland, much less disputes what I took the time to lay out here.

Par for his critics. Never any proof to back up claims that Garland delayed something, other than pointing to the time passed.

The most ridiculous is looking at what the Supreme Court did with the reams of evidence in the indictment, and selectively nullifying it by inventing law and misinterpreting the Constitution, and supposing Garland could have brought forward charges early on with evidence that was still tied up in challenges and appeals.

And maybe explain how we get to the indictments without GARLAND"S prosecutors working SUCCESSFULLY for years moving through myriad, successive courts to get the attorney and other executive privileges removed from almost a dozen top Trump WH officials and attorneys who are KEY WITNESSES against Trump?

There's no actual analysis of what actually happened in these complaints, just 'Garland late.'

It's mindnumbingly banal.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The worst single-day crim...»Reply #6