Karoline Leavitt Can't Cover Up the Truth. Trump's Cankles and Hand Makeup Say It All

[Bernardo de La Paz]

29. Agree with 4.5 of your 5 sentences

1: It is. What percentage of people have it or not is not the issue raised, since only the spelling was raised, not the person. Please notice that I did not even call it a mistake until my third post in the thread and only after a couple of objections which took personal offence. I would add that there are tools such as spell checkers that can be curated to help, such as marking Newsome as an error in the dictionary. Further, if an error occurs that is dryly noted without rancor there are the first three options: A) one can silently accept it and edit the post or B) publicly accept it without explanation and edit the post or C) one can publicly accept it with explanation and edit the post. The other options introduce rancor. I understand why people with a disability tire of explaining which is why I feel no explanation is necessary.

2: It is not a reflection of IQ, but oddly you are the only one to mention that discredited statistic.

3. Beware of binary thinking. There are degrees of effectiveness of conveyance. Spelling errors derail reading momentarily while the meaning is deciphered. Spelling errors in Democratic leaders that we support (to some degree, by definition of DU) derail reading for a longer moment while the reader works to reassure themselves that the writer is not a newly minted troll.

4. I'll accept your info about Einstein and many others without looking it up.

5. Indeed we can search.