Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 11:49 PM Dec 2012

I am not ready to eat crow and assume the cuts to Social Security are off the table. [View all]

I am eagerly awaiting word that the new COLA using Chained CPI is no longer up for discussion.

So far I have not seen anything definitive. I have seen pictures of crows and read call outs for those of us who are speaking up about Democrats putting such cuts up for discussion with a bunch of extremist Republicans.

Let me quote Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer. Then I will quote the words of a union leader.

Chained CPI Not A Deal Breaker For Many Democrats

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), however, said this week that she did not consider chained CPI a benefit cut and that she could get enough Democrats to support it.


More from Pelosi:

Pelosi and Hoyer keeping an open mind to cuts to entitlement programs

The Democrats will stick with the president,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Tuesday when asked about the Social Security provisions on MSNBC.

Pelosi emphasized that the details of the plan “are not all ironed out,” and acknowledged that “maybe not every single Democrat” would support it. But she expressed confidence that an agreement backed by Obama — if it protected the oldest and the poorest — would win significant support from her troops.


Steny Hoyer, from that same article:

House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) delivered a similar message Tuesday.

“Everybody needs to understand that nobody is going to be happy with every provision of a deal,” Hoyer warned. “Some members will have problems with some parts, but … if we get an agreement that the president can support, hopefully we can get a majority in the House — Republicans and Democrats — and Speaker John Boehner [R-Ohio] and the leader Pelosi and I will convince members that we ought to move forward.”

Hoyer added, “Affecting entitlements would not be our first choice, but then again, I don’t think you get there from here without dealing, in some respects, with entitlements.”


And the vague indefinite words from Richard Trumka on the chained CPI:

Richard Trumka On Fiscal Cliff: Not Ready To Blow Up Deal Over Obama's Social Security Concession

In other words it sounds like he does not want to be the first to blink. If everyone acts that way, no telling what we will end up with in the final agreement.

WASHINGTON -- The head of the most powerful union federation in the country is holding off judgment on President Obama's most recent debt reduction proposal, despite its inclusion of cuts to Social Security beneficiaries.

AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka called the chained-CPI proposal offered by Obama as part of his recent effort to resolve the so-called fiscal cliff standoff, "bad policy" that he and his group were strongly against. But in an interview with The Huffington Post on Thursday morning, Trumka stopped notably short of urging Democrats to walk away from the table because of it.

"I want to see more of the details. But we oppose the cuts," Trumka said. "We'll oppose the cuts. We will be talking to them about a number of things. Obviously I want to look at the whole deal before we make any decision."


Trumka, like others in the labor community, has been placed in a political pickle following the president's most recent offer. Having spent months demanding that Democrats remove Social Security from the negotiating table, he's now confronted with the choice of supporting a deal with those very cuts, or demanding their removal and risking no deal at all. The latter would mean no chained-CPI, which would result in less generous cost of living adjustments for those on Social Security. But it also would mean the loss of two other labor priorities: unemployment benefits and infrastructure money, both of which are also in Obama's latest proposal.


And what about all our calls and emails?

So what do you do when the president puts Social Security cuts on the table for discussion? You can say they are not cuts, they are making it stronger. We have heard that so many times before.

Sounds to me like all three leaders above are not paying attention to what the people are saying very loudly..."no cuts to Social Security." They seem to be determined to stay on talking points and not make waves about it.

When people are ridiculed and asked to eat crow before all the facts are in, there is a dark cloud put over honest and clear discussions of party policy.

It should not be us vs them in an atmosphere of gotcha.




57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sounds like everybody and their brother are throwing SS recipients under the bus. forestpath Dec 2012 #1
They are. madfloridian Dec 2012 #9
I'm Confused WVRICK13 Dec 2012 #38
You are right. He said there would be no cuts. madfloridian Dec 2012 #57
Let's forget about the chained CPI Dyedinthewoolliberal Dec 2012 #2
Democratic presidents should not play games with Social Security dflprincess Dec 2012 #4
Agreed nt newfie11 Dec 2012 #36
You are right. Should never have been put on the table. madfloridian Dec 2012 #42
Yep. That's what people can't understand. duffyduff Dec 2012 #44
And you were looking for the Senate to add the Public Option BlueStreak Dec 2012 #10
I agree. As long as so many Dem forums defend such cuts needed pressure.. madfloridian Dec 2012 #13
+100% snot Dec 2012 #27
Hi snot... madfloridian Dec 2012 #29
No worries: I expect it will be back within a few weeks. MannyGoldstein Dec 2012 #3
Yes, they have been rescuing it for years now. It never gets rescued enough. madfloridian Dec 2012 #6
K&R. I'm with you, madfloridian. I don't get where Boehner's failure = SS off the table! MotherPetrie Dec 2012 #5
Thanks. I think you are very righte, madfloridian. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #7
Thanks, but most here do not. I accept that. madfloridian Dec 2012 #8
"Most"? No. BlueStreak Dec 2012 #12
I hope you are right. madfloridian Dec 2012 #15
Wow. In your case, I think you shd take that as a sign of your effectiveness. snot Dec 2012 #28
I would like to think that. madfloridian Dec 2012 #35
Make that 10 today. madfloridian Dec 2012 #46
I will believe the cuts, when they actually commence Rex Dec 2012 #11
ssi isn't social security, it's supplemental security income, paid from income taxes; aka HiPointDem Dec 2012 #17
Ah thanks, yes I thought SSI was short for social security. Rex Dec 2012 #18
not medicaid either, separate program, doesn't do medical. it's income support. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #20
I believe it would be political suicide for a party Rex Dec 2012 #21
reagan, 1983 -- started taxing benefits & there were some other cuts as well, i believe. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #22
Thanks. Rex Dec 2012 #24
Excuse me, but when they required us to pay more for the same benefit, snot Dec 2012 #30
Doesn't matter if you believe it or not. Question is: caseymoz Dec 2012 #31
They were on the table... kentuck Dec 2012 #14
Vigilance is the price of liberty. No reason to eat crow, whatever happens. Ignore the agents. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #16
This is the correct answer. woo me with science Dec 2012 #40
+1 limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #51
Assumptions are never a good idea riqster Dec 2012 #19
I wait for data, and I do not freak out. I will watch every move. madfloridian Dec 2012 #23
I'm right there with you. MrSlayer Dec 2012 #25
If SS cuts are off the table now I suspect that they will be back on the table soon Teamster Jeff Dec 2012 #26
I hope not, my SS check in small enough now. JohLast Dec 2012 #39
K&R. blackspade Dec 2012 #32
I don't give a f*** about waiting or not. I care about ACTING, snot Dec 2012 #33
"only way it comes off is if we convince them it will cost them more to keep it on." madfloridian Dec 2012 #34
Neither am I Faryn Balyncd Dec 2012 #37
While on the table, let's switch it back to salary based inflation. Festivito Dec 2012 #41
Good, because they're not Doctor_J Dec 2012 #43
Yep. It's totally unacceptable. n/t duffyduff Dec 2012 #45
Regardless of what ultimately happens, they WERE put on the table MNBrewer Dec 2012 #47
Now that is the true point after all. Thanks. madfloridian Dec 2012 #53
The call out ought to be for the fuckers who said he'd never offer cuts. DirkGently Dec 2012 #48
bingo limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #50
I wouldn't ever apologize for defending Social Security limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #49
Me neither, since I am a recipient of Social Security, RebelOne Dec 2012 #56
The difference between the chained COLA & ending tax cuts Jackpine Radical Dec 2012 #52
Of course they aren't off the table. woo me with science Dec 2012 #54
They have tried for years. madfloridian Dec 2012 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am not ready to eat cro...