Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 04:02 AM Dec 2012

there seems to be a semantics issue here concerning guns.new words might help.Offensive Weapons Ban [View all]

i think someone on this forum said something about GUNS, and somebody else got confused

maybe more than once.

Offensive- meaning ANY gun that is designed for the military. offense/attack.

people who aren't fighting a war (the public) don't need to have the same guns as soldiers.

are there any guns that hold more than 12 bullets that aren't for soldiers?

i don't understand how you need more than 12 to go hunting- if you need 12 to kill an animal, i'd say stop spending so much on bullets and take a hunting class and shooting lessons.

and for self-defense, why more than 12? if you are being attacked by so many criminals 12 isn't enough, you're in serious trouble. ANY gun isn't going to be much help. the best way a gun defends you is if the baddies run away, i doubt someone would base whether they're going to run away or not on how many bullets you have or the size of the gun. understand?

if you get mugged by 5 guys, either:
1. you pull your gun, they run away.
2. you shoot one, the other 4 run away
3. you shoot a couple, get overpowered, bad scene

you can't shoot in 5 different directions at once. they'll have weapons, too
more bullets wouldn't come into play when you're totally outnumbered

so OFFENSIVE WEAPONS BAN means you can't have a gun that holds more than 12. you can keep all your guns that you already have, just trade in your 30 round clip for 2 twelves.

ok, let's hear about how HORRIBLE this would be!

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
farminator3000, you rock! tblue Dec 2012 #1
thanks! farminator3000 Dec 2012 #2
There are many pistols ComplimentarySwine Dec 2012 #3
why? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #17
Home defense, concealed carry, target shooting ComplimentarySwine Dec 2012 #19
great! farminator3000 Dec 2012 #26
Wow, that's a lot of questions. ComplimentarySwine Dec 2012 #29
thanks for the answers farminator3000 Dec 2012 #30
Better To Just Outlaw All Weapons And Then The Various Scenarios Become Irrelevant cantbeserious Dec 2012 #4
Because if they were outlawed, no one would have them. Kinda like weed. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #32
This may well be the stupidest post on the Internet today. PavePusher Dec 2012 #5
Tell us more Lordquinton Dec 2012 #6
For the life of me, I can't recall ever claiming expertise on the subject. PavePusher Dec 2012 #7
Then could you perhaps address the ideas proposed in the OP? Orrex Dec 2012 #9
Any weapon that can be used in defense can be used in offense, and vice versa. PavePusher Dec 2012 #13
The intent of a weapon is in the design Orrex Dec 2012 #14
and any gun that can commit mass murder in 30 sec or less farminator3000 Dec 2012 #22
no, but you said you were smarter than a post on the internet farminator3000 Dec 2012 #21
Haha, pulled that right out of your ass! xoom Dec 2012 #15
Thank you for warning us what was to come in your post... quakerboy Dec 2012 #10
ha! that's totally aweome! farminator3000 Dec 2012 #23
i doubt it why don't you keep looking farminator3000 Dec 2012 #18
do you expect me to agree with you? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #20
Yeah, there are some guns, JoeyT Dec 2012 #8
"people who aren't fighting a war (the public) don't need to have the same guns as soldiers." beevul Dec 2012 #11
That's a common Libertarian mantra, by the way Orrex Dec 2012 #12
What a great example billh58 Dec 2012 #24
Then by definition, the OP is selling a half truth as well. beevul Dec 2012 #27
The public has access to offensive weapons. Ron Green Dec 2012 #25
i figured it out for myself. try it sometime farminator3000 Dec 2012 #28
Kicking and recommending this because Ron Green Dec 2012 #16
thanks farminator3000 Dec 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»there seems to be a seman...