Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DarthDem

(5,462 posts)
9. The charges are federal because . . .
Sun Aug 31, 2025, 08:55 AM
Aug 2025

. . . the federal government charged him with stalking the poor victims using email and GPS, instrumentalities involving interstate commerce, which creates federal jurisdiction. The remaining charges—including the murder charges–relate to the stalking crime and can therefore be brought in federal court as well.

Incidentally, Boelter has also been indicted on state charges. In such scenarios, the federal charges are usually handled first. But even if the federal case was to disappear—I'm not saying you implied it would, nor am I; I'm just clarifying a point—the state charges would move forward immediately.

I agree that the incident has been out of the news at the national level, to say the least, which is very sad.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Status - indicted on 6 federal charges on July 15th, pled not guilty on Aug 7 (links) lostnfound Aug 2025 #1
The charges are federal because . . . DarthDem Aug 2025 #9
Thanks for the clear explanation. I guess Pam Bondi and Kash Patel... lostnfound Sep 2025 #31
You're welcome DarthDem Sep 2025 #33
Damn TheFarseer Aug 2025 #2
It certainly appears that way. niyad Aug 2025 #8
Would you be surprised if they were? (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Aug 2025 #17
Unlikely given how they work and our limited ability to control what the output will be EdmondDantes_ Aug 2025 #18
I pretty Rebl2 Aug 2025 #29
"I went to the shitty answer machine and it gave me a shitty answer." WhiskeyGrinder Aug 2025 #3
You're missing my point, nt lostnfound Aug 2025 #4
You both are correct wolfie001 Aug 2025 #15
No, they were repeating your point muriel_volestrangler Sep 2025 #34
What was your question/prompt? I got an entirely different response from Google. sl8 Aug 2025 #5
investigation boelter shooting lostnfound Aug 2025 #16
Thanks. sl8 Aug 2025 #21
Infowars-prepper-gun-guy anti-gay preacher doesn't fit the profile lostnfound Aug 2025 #6
Thank you for this information. Disturbing, and one of the reasons I niyad Aug 2025 #7
Agree DarthDem Aug 2025 #10
Yep. And what a waste of time having to verify. paleotn Aug 2025 #20
As important as better algorithms is what data they train on karynnj Aug 2025 #27
True, lots of great uses. An apparent down side is some loss of professional skils? lostnfound Sep 2025 #30
Wish a good billionaire could fund a library initiative to make an expanding carefully-trained database for public use lostnfound Sep 2025 #32
Yeah, like it's somehow able to sift through all the internet BS and return reality. In many cases, no. paleotn Aug 2025 #19
AI is the devil. Scrivener7 Aug 2025 #11
AI only knows what its fed. And it's feeding on the garbage pile that is social media. paleotn Aug 2025 #12
The national media always fades out on these rightwing hit stories viva la Aug 2025 #13
Yes, it was mentioned in early articles and yes, it was Democrats targeted karynnj Aug 2025 #28
Peter Thiel's greasy hands all over this wolfie001 Aug 2025 #14
i engage with AI only minimally barbtries Aug 2025 #22
We can tell there was no political agenda based on how the dude looks IronLionZion Aug 2025 #23
This is what I got when I expanded the Google prompt Aviation Pro Aug 2025 #24
Self delete to consider how I'm saying what I'm saying. But I think you are right. Hekate Aug 2025 #25
More evidence that AI is crap. All it knows is what it sucks up from every cesspool on the internet. Ocelot II Aug 2025 #26
I've seen some blatantly incorrect things from gen AI recently Renew Deal Sep 2025 #35
My favorite part of low-info AI hating is the unironic parroting of 'garbage in, garbage out' TheProle Sep 2025 #36
I've successfully used detailed prompts for plenty of deep structured answers. This OP was prompted by 2 concerns. lostnfound Sep 2025 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bizarre "explanation" for...»Reply #9