Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bucolic_frolic

(56,052 posts)
5. I think this post means
Wed Sep 3, 2025, 10:15 AM
Sep 2025

OBLITERATING the criminal code by scrambling rulings with nonsense, obfuscation, and DoubleSpeak is the same as breaking the law in a traditional sense, therefore partisan judges should be subject to the same penalties as traditional criminals.

There's a lot there that has never been articulated in concepts in the English Language. Is there a term for judicial rulings that rule the exact opposite of what the law clearly says? No. Never been an issue before.

The boundaries of jurisprudence? Unclear in the concept of looking the other way. Sort of like law enforcement in a one-Sheriff town.

The OP gets high marks for saying a lot while saying little. Could be a future SCOTUS Justice!

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think you are making stuff up and your post does not make sense grammatically as it can be read multiple ways Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2025 #1
It would ForgedCrank Sep 2025 #2
Great Post! Kid Berwyn Sep 2025 #3
but will they? samsingh Sep 2025 #4
I think this post means bucolic_frolic Sep 2025 #5
Let's Review the Process and Probabilty PBC_Democrat Sep 2025 #6
They could be term limited however.... getagrip_already Sep 2025 #7
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS partisan judges ca...»Reply #5