Have you ever heard of the DOOR KICK CHALLENGE?

[sop]

140. Yours was an imaginative and speculative post.

What is the real point you are trying to make? That shooting someone for trying to kick down your front door is justified? It probably would be under such extreme circumstances; Castle Doctrine laws legally allow homeowners to use deadly force to defend their homes.

The recent case of an eleven-year-old boy shot by a homeowner while running away after ringing a doorbell was discussed here at length. A number of people here expressed rather extreme views about that shooting, believing it could be justified. Most thought it was not justified, that it was murder.

Your post seems to be a veiled effort to justify the shooting of this eleven-year-old boy for simply ringing a doorbell and running away, a childish prank at worst, by using an extreme example of someone trying to actually kick down a front door. I'm not the only one who sees the point you're trying to make using an Appeal to Extremes.