Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usonian

(26,648 posts)
3. I haven't heard back from "the resident mitigator" yet.
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 10:38 AM
Sep 2025

I only worry that the DOJ has had sufficient time to "magically transform" the files with the AI machine to indict all Trump's "enemies"

Take this statement with two possible meanings.

Trump: DOJ has 'done its job' on Epstein files
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220614067
Thanks, Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

It could mean, "there's nothing more to see", or
DOJ has "done a job" on the Epstein files, as in "altered and destroyed."

I worked for a small company where a person walked in, picked up a chair, and sat by the front door until the boss paid him some debt. I am sure there were many more who didn't have the gumption to call him on it.

The boss said "Well, someone should take him out"

One meaning of that was "Someone should take him out to lunch, to appease him"
Another meaning, familiar to those of us who grew up in mafia towns, was
"Someone should take him out" and dump the body in the estuary.

You never know, with a double-talking exploiter.

From the above article (a reply):



But the fact that he wants it all sealed in a mayonnaise jar on Funk And Wagnall's front porch suggests that they haven't rewritten all the evidence.



Maybe only Carnac knows?

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

interesting Skittles Sep 2025 #1
I haven't heard back from "the resident mitigator" yet. usonian Sep 2025 #3
DU it, D.U.! calimary Sep 2025 #2
Kick and rec. Wednesdays Sep 2025 #4
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We can force a vote on re...»Reply #3