Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Onion officially gives up! [View all]FakeNoose
(41,647 posts)7. Pretzel logic

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
13 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
At the time Trump informed on Epstein, the criminals were not Trump's donors yet, so he had no reason to protect them.
SunSeeker
Sep 2025
#43
I always look up (google) info and have no problem with it. :/ It's not really a job.
C Moon
Sep 2025
#23
Link for which? FBI informant claim? (Fact.) Onion closing claim? (Joke.) n/t
thesquanderer
Sep 2025
#25
Trump was more a snitch than an informant. He snitched after Epstein threatened to sue him over a land deal.
SunSeeker
Sep 2025
#22
My comment was directed at Josh Marshall who seemed to endorse this theory but should know better.
Wiz Imp
Sep 2025
#39
Circumstantial evidence is evidence. People get convicted with it all the time.
SunSeeker
Sep 2025
#40
The real estate deal was in 2004. The investigation of Epstein began in 2005.
SunSeeker
Sep 2025
#44
Tapes are hard evidence. What are the instances where Wolff has contradicted himself?
SunSeeker
Sep 2025
#65