General Discussion

Wiz Imp

(10,590 posts)

39. My comment was directed at Josh Marshall who seemed to endorse this theory but should know better.

Reply to soldierant (Reply #36)

Sun Sep 7, 2025, 01:11 PM

Sep 2025

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

soldierant

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Onion officially gives up! [View all] True Dough Sep 2025 OP

I understand completely surfered Sep 2025 #1

DEMOCRAT hoax Skittles Sep 2025 #2

Correct. Trump would never call it a Democratic hoax MadameButterfly Sep 2025 #12

I don't think they realize how stupid they sound, all parroting each other Skittles Sep 2025 #19

Doesn't matter. Kablooie Sep 2025 #24

Like a bunch of bobble heads mdbl Sep 2025 #38

kind of.......proving my point Skittles Sep 2025 #50

Pretzel logic FakeNoose Sep 2025 #7

My favorite: PCIntern Sep 2025 #33

So he's part of the hoax IronLionZion Sep 2025 #15

At the time Trump informed on Epstein, the criminals were not Trump's donors yet, so he had no reason to protect them. SunSeeker Sep 2025 #43

Lol BlueWaveNeverEnd Sep 2025 #3

links please. if i forward to others, a worthwhile link Tetrachloride Sep 2025 #4

it will come up quickly in a google search MadameButterfly Sep 2025 #13

not my job to google every rumor Tetrachloride Sep 2025 #17

This was not a rumor MadameButterfly Sep 2025 #26

i skip unsubstantiated claims Tetrachloride Sep 2025 #37

okay Torchlight Sep 2025 #41

I always look up (google) info and have no problem with it. :/ It's not really a job. C Moon Sep 2025 #23

I love googling! brakester Sep 2025 #35

i allow myself excursions into wikipedia Tetrachloride Sep 2025 #49

in the past when i had no life, i had time to spare Tetrachloride Sep 2025 #48

Trump fbi snitch? summer_in_TX Sep 2025 #16

It's a joke Kaleva Sep 2025 #20

Link for which? FBI informant claim? (Fact.) Onion closing claim? (Joke.) n/t thesquanderer Sep 2025 #25

It is satire. Celerity Sep 2025 #34

LOL In It to Win It Sep 2025 #5

Well, actually we do, to maintain our sanity, MadameButterfly Sep 2025 #14

Hey, Johnson's got jokes . . . Good jokes! madashelltoo Sep 2025 #6

That's been the case for a while now. iemanja Sep 2025 #8

They're not serious, are they? calimary Sep 2025 #9

I think they're just having some fun, True Dough Sep 2025 #10

Take a look at "a" fbi informant. .The Onion has better grammar. niyad Sep 2025 #51

Yep, the truth is in the details. calimary Sep 2025 #52

My internal editor has daily fits. A novel that I am currently reading niyad Sep 2025 #56

Spelling was always a thing for me. calimary Sep 2025 #57

Well, you are smart. Between bad grammar, poor spelling, and whatever niyad Sep 2025 #61

Classic, reality is stranger than fiction. Buddyzbuddy Sep 2025 #11

No shit. Solly Mack Sep 2025 #18

Mike Johnson has jumped The Onion Blue Owl Sep 2025 #21

Preferable to jumping the couch. rubbersole Sep 2025 #28

Trump was more a snitch than an informant. He snitched after Epstein threatened to sue him over a land deal. SunSeeker Sep 2025 #22

There is absolutely zero evidence to support this "theory" Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #31

Since when does MAGA need evidence? soldierant Sep 2025 #36

My comment was directed at Josh Marshall who seemed to endorse this theory but should know better. Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #39

Circumstantial evidence is evidence. People get convicted with it all the time. SunSeeker Sep 2025 #40

Weak "evidence" Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #42

The real estate deal was in 2004. The investigation of Epstein began in 2005. SunSeeker Sep 2025 #44

Then why the MorbidButterflyTat Sep 2025 #60

Trump doesn't care about consistency. SunSeeker Sep 2025 #63

OK. I should have said there is zero "hard" evidence Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #64

Tapes are hard evidence. What are the instances where Wolff has contradicted himself? SunSeeker Sep 2025 #65

Hilarious and Terrifying. Never seen this before. FUCKING NEVER. OverBurn Sep 2025 #27

This made me smile LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #29

A vs. an. Pay atterntion "the Onion"! GreenWave Sep 2025 #30

Thank you. niyad Sep 2025 #32

Indeed, indeed. LAS14 Sep 2025 #53

Maybe NOT The Onion -- and YOU should pay "atterntion" (eom) ClickClack Sep 2025 #59

Too good malaise Sep 2025 #45

That's alright, "Onion." Take a few days off. Rest up. Paladin Sep 2025 #46

I forget who did it but a reporter called 2,000 people in the black book JanMichael Sep 2025 #47

The Onion didn't fold. red dog 1 Sep 2025 #54

It was The Onion True Dough Sep 2025 #55

Funny, but not actually on The Onion website? ClickClack Sep 2025 #58

I didn't see it there, either. MorbidButterflyTat Sep 2025 #62