Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SunSeeker

(58,378 posts)
43. At the time Trump informed on Epstein, the criminals were not Trump's donors yet, so he had no reason to protect them.
Sun Sep 7, 2025, 01:58 PM
Sep 2025

The first prosecution of Epstein began right after he and Trump had their falling out over a 2004 real estate deal. Epstein, who wanted the Florida property Trump scooped up, had threatened to sue Trump over the shady machinations Trump used in scooping up the property out from under Epstein.

Trump was on the verge of bankruptcy at the time of his property purchase and it would have been next to impossible for him to get a loan from a bank at that time, yet somehow he came up with $41.35 million to purchase the property. He turned around and sold the property to Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev in 2008 for over $50 million more than he bought it for, strongly indicating it was a Russian money laundering operation all along. This ugly info on Trump would have come out in Epstein’s lawsuit. A child sex trafficking investigation would blunt Epstein’s credibility, and distract him from filing a lawsuit against Trump altogether. 

The investigation of Epstein began in 2005 and led to his arrest and indictment on a state charge in July 2006.  The case was concluded with that controversial Acosta plea deal in June 2008, where Epstein pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges and served only 13 months of an 18-month sentence. Federal prosecutors secretly agreed not to file their own charges. https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/local/2025/07/08/jeffrey-epstein-timeline-florida-case-led-to-15-years-of-sex-abuse/84510353007/#:~:text=Epstein%20pleads%20guilty%20to%20the,he's%20back%20in%2024%20hours

Looks like the criminals had their own ability to protect themselves from the prosecution in 2005-2008, they didn't need Trump.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Onion officially gives up! [View all] True Dough Sep 2025 OP
I understand completely surfered Sep 2025 #1
DEMOCRAT hoax Skittles Sep 2025 #2
Correct. Trump would never call it a Democratic hoax MadameButterfly Sep 2025 #12
I don't think they realize how stupid they sound, all parroting each other Skittles Sep 2025 #19
Doesn't matter. Kablooie Sep 2025 #24
Like a bunch of bobble heads mdbl Sep 2025 #38
kind of.......proving my point Skittles Sep 2025 #50
Pretzel logic FakeNoose Sep 2025 #7
My favorite: PCIntern Sep 2025 #33
So he's part of the hoax IronLionZion Sep 2025 #15
At the time Trump informed on Epstein, the criminals were not Trump's donors yet, so he had no reason to protect them. SunSeeker Sep 2025 #43
Lol BlueWaveNeverEnd Sep 2025 #3
links please. if i forward to others, a worthwhile link Tetrachloride Sep 2025 #4
it will come up quickly in a google search MadameButterfly Sep 2025 #13
not my job to google every rumor Tetrachloride Sep 2025 #17
This was not a rumor MadameButterfly Sep 2025 #26
i skip unsubstantiated claims Tetrachloride Sep 2025 #37
okay Torchlight Sep 2025 #41
I always look up (google) info and have no problem with it. :/ It's not really a job. C Moon Sep 2025 #23
I love googling! brakester Sep 2025 #35
i allow myself excursions into wikipedia Tetrachloride Sep 2025 #49
in the past when i had no life, i had time to spare Tetrachloride Sep 2025 #48
Trump fbi snitch? summer_in_TX Sep 2025 #16
It's a joke Kaleva Sep 2025 #20
Link for which? FBI informant claim? (Fact.) Onion closing claim? (Joke.) n/t thesquanderer Sep 2025 #25
It is satire. Celerity Sep 2025 #34
LOL In It to Win It Sep 2025 #5
Well, actually we do, to maintain our sanity, MadameButterfly Sep 2025 #14
Hey, Johnson's got jokes . . . Good jokes! madashelltoo Sep 2025 #6
That's been the case for a while now. iemanja Sep 2025 #8
They're not serious, are they? calimary Sep 2025 #9
I think they're just having some fun, True Dough Sep 2025 #10
Take a look at "a" fbi informant. .The Onion has better grammar. niyad Sep 2025 #51
Yep, the truth is in the details. calimary Sep 2025 #52
My internal editor has daily fits. A novel that I am currently reading niyad Sep 2025 #56
Spelling was always a thing for me. calimary Sep 2025 #57
Well, you are smart. Between bad grammar, poor spelling, and whatever niyad Sep 2025 #61
Classic, reality is stranger than fiction. Buddyzbuddy Sep 2025 #11
No shit. Solly Mack Sep 2025 #18
Mike Johnson has jumped The Onion Blue Owl Sep 2025 #21
Preferable to jumping the couch. rubbersole Sep 2025 #28
Trump was more a snitch than an informant. He snitched after Epstein threatened to sue him over a land deal. SunSeeker Sep 2025 #22
There is absolutely zero evidence to support this "theory" Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #31
Since when does MAGA need evidence? soldierant Sep 2025 #36
My comment was directed at Josh Marshall who seemed to endorse this theory but should know better. Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #39
Circumstantial evidence is evidence. People get convicted with it all the time. SunSeeker Sep 2025 #40
Weak "evidence" Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #42
The real estate deal was in 2004. The investigation of Epstein began in 2005. SunSeeker Sep 2025 #44
Then why the MorbidButterflyTat Sep 2025 #60
Trump doesn't care about consistency. SunSeeker Sep 2025 #63
OK. I should have said there is zero "hard" evidence Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #64
Tapes are hard evidence. What are the instances where Wolff has contradicted himself? SunSeeker Sep 2025 #65
Hilarious and Terrifying. Never seen this before. FUCKING NEVER. OverBurn Sep 2025 #27
This made me smile LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2025 #29
A vs. an. Pay atterntion "the Onion"! GreenWave Sep 2025 #30
Thank you. niyad Sep 2025 #32
Indeed, indeed. LAS14 Sep 2025 #53
Maybe NOT The Onion -- and YOU should pay "atterntion" (eom) ClickClack Sep 2025 #59
Too good malaise Sep 2025 #45
That's alright, "Onion." Take a few days off. Rest up. Paladin Sep 2025 #46
I forget who did it but a reporter called 2,000 people in the black book JanMichael Sep 2025 #47
The Onion didn't fold. red dog 1 Sep 2025 #54
It was The Onion True Dough Sep 2025 #55
Funny, but not actually on The Onion website? ClickClack Sep 2025 #58
I didn't see it there, either. MorbidButterflyTat Sep 2025 #62
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Onion officially give...»Reply #43