Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Harris: Reluctance to pressure Biden out of 2024 was 'recklessness' [View all]
Former Vice President Kamala Harris writes in her forthcoming book that it was reckless to leave Joe Bidens decision to run for reelection up to the then-presidents personal choice, arguing that she and others around the president should have exerted more influence on him to step aside earlier.
Its Joe and Jills decision. We all said that, like a mantra, as if wed all been hypnotized, Harris wrote in an excerpt from her book published by The Atlantic Wednesday morning. Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness. The stakes were simply too high. This wasnt a choice that should have been left to an individuals ego, an individuals ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision.
But Harris argued as Bidens potential successor, she was in the worst possible position to advise him on dropping out. Challenging the then-presidents call, she wrote, would have come off as incredibly self-serving.
He would see it as naked ambition, perhaps as poisonous disloyalty, even if my only message was: Dont let the other guy win, she said.
Its Joe and Jills decision. We all said that, like a mantra, as if wed all been hypnotized, Harris wrote in an excerpt from her book published by The Atlantic Wednesday morning. Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness. The stakes were simply too high. This wasnt a choice that should have been left to an individuals ego, an individuals ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision.
But Harris argued as Bidens potential successor, she was in the worst possible position to advise him on dropping out. Challenging the then-presidents call, she wrote, would have come off as incredibly self-serving.
He would see it as naked ambition, perhaps as poisonous disloyalty, even if my only message was: Dont let the other guy win, she said.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/10/kamala-harris-book-excerpt-joe-biden-2024-election-00555057
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I actually posted The Atlantic article this morning for those who may be interested...
PunkinPi
Sep 2025
#13
Ideally Biden should have run in 2020 upon a platform of being a one-term president
Justice Brandeis
Sep 2025
#10
She's right and she was in an incredibly challenging situation. He made it worse unfortunately (& tragically)
themaguffin
Sep 2025
#11
But wait... didn't she win? Didn't they change the vote totals using starlink magic?
mr715
Sep 2025
#14
Decision makers at all levels did not have they eyes on the long term horizon
bucolic_frolic
Sep 2025
#15
The problem is people with a mental decline often do not recognize their own deminshied capabilities.
mackdaddy
Sep 2025
#20
I disagree with every word. I believe Biden would have been fine had Democrats supported.
Demsrule86
Sep 2025
#23
Biden should've announced he would only be a one term president after winning
awesomerwb1
Sep 2025
#27