Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,746 posts)
31. I agree
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 11:35 AM
Sep 2025

Without the Epstein connection, I could see it being used as a positive to anyone who, like most kids, is interested and fascinated by many diverse things.

Having read the NYT article on his connection to Chase Bank, one early point they make is that Epstein was a collector of people. From those referenced later in the article, it seemed that he enjoyed the company of innovative, clever people in addition to many with power, wealth or status.

Reading that article, it is clear Chase intentionally had a blind eye to many red flags that should have been reported earlier because he was able to connect them to people who made a lot of money for them. It also makes it clear that his connections to powerful people was what gave people the excuse to overlook things they should have been suspicious of.

Here, Clinton was, to some degree, a victim of Epstein wanting the prestige of closeness to a former President. Offering his plane for use of the Clinton Foundation, which was unquestionably doing good work was both a genuine contribution to the foundation and a connection that added to the powerful people that others saw around Epstein.

Why a victim? There is absolutely no information that implicates Clinton in anything directly or in knowing there was anything wrong. Yet from internet accusations even though no victim has accused Clinton and the Comer subpoenas, he has been smeared by the association.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The birthday book is a testimony to the out in the open depravity of rich white males. Irish_Dem Sep 2025 #1
Oh, definitely writerJT Sep 2025 #3
Why do you mention just Bill Clinton? Stargazer99 Sep 2025 #2
Um DiceK Sep 2025 #4
Seriously??? niyad Sep 2025 #6
Maxwell asked a lot of famous people to write letters Johonny Sep 2025 #24
Yes LeftInTX Sep 2025 #41
Dear Goddess, that was practically illegible. niyad Sep 2025 #42
I updated the post with a better transcription from the Guardian. LeftInTX Sep 2025 #43
Read it yourself. Layzeebeaver Sep 2025 #48
remdi95 niyad Sep 2025 #53
Clinton's writing is nearly illegible so I was glad to see a transcript senseandsensibility Sep 2025 #46
You betcha! Layzeebeaver Sep 2025 #22
I don't know, but joined in 2019...seems to have a "Clinton fixation" maxrandb Sep 2025 #29
My understanding is the Clinton entry ... Dave says Sep 2025 #34
It's a nothing burger. But Epstein was a significant contributor to the Clinton Foundation LeftInTX Sep 2025 #45
Noticed that, too obamanut2012 Sep 2025 #38
They are concerned, aren't they? mercuryblues Sep 2025 #40
You know, if you are going to single out Bill Clinton in that incendiary way, niyad Sep 2025 #5
thank you nyad jaymac Sep 2025 #7
You are most welcome. niyad Sep 2025 #17
You can download the entire book Layzeebeaver Sep 2025 #23
You specifically singled out Bill Clinton, so you could have easily posted niyad Sep 2025 #32
He's in there. A page of his own. Layzeebeaver Sep 2025 #47
The why mention Clinton without ZERO CONTEXT? obamanut2012 Sep 2025 #39
I did Layzeebeaver Sep 2025 #52
No doubt, you felt like you needed a shower after reading it dlk Sep 2025 #8
Thank you for your sacrifice. . surfered Sep 2025 #9
Why don't you explain to those of us who didn't read it all... llmart Sep 2025 #10
An implied hit job on Bill Clinton, since the actual, brief note was posted niyad Sep 2025 #33
Thanks. I didn't see that. llmart Sep 2025 #36
You are most welcome. niyad Sep 2025 #37
For better context re: Clinton, the book was from 2003. Tommy Carcetti Sep 2025 #11
Clinton's note said the following. Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #12
I dunno EYESORE 9001 Sep 2025 #14
Wonderful secret mzmolly Sep 2025 #15
Agreed EYESORE 9001 Sep 2025 #16
The phrase "childlike curiosity" was in common use long before the perversions niyad Sep 2025 #19
I agree karynnj Sep 2025 #31
You're reading something into it that just isn't there. Wiz Imp Sep 2025 #21
That is an all to common affliction here. Disaffected Sep 2025 #25
Out of the thousands of ways to describe a person, it's an uncanny coincidence, still-prayin4rain Sep 2025 #50
Not to me. llmart Sep 2025 #35
Thank you for posting it so there is no confusion. niyad Sep 2025 #18
If Clinton had said anything creepy, the Republicans would have blasted it out immediately. Jim__ Sep 2025 #28
I've always thought that there is a an underground river of perversion that runs through Washington and it has Hotler Sep 2025 #13
This looks really, really bad for Mr. trump Torchlight Sep 2025 #20
IMO, If (a big if) anyone knew this guy was a pedophile and still remained friends walkingman Sep 2025 #26
Follow the money indeed... yourout Sep 2025 #27
At least Clinton didn't turn his signature maxrandb Sep 2025 #30
LOL...Good one! Sogo Sep 2025 #44
I updated the OP Layzeebeaver Sep 2025 #49
I agree with you 100%. Pretty GD big coincidence in that choice of words. still-prayin4rain Sep 2025 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I've read through the ent...»Reply #31