Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)
25. so what does that mean for the states who regulate guns?
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 12:55 AM
Dec 2012

they are in danger of being attacked by the other states with more guns?

i went and read some more, like you said. all the way to the END of the post, where it says:

nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings,
or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.

these things in italics (the slanty letters) are the things that people want to ban, because they are very bad.
the part after the italics kinda means laws SHOULD be made, to stop the things in the italics from happening.

if you are asking me if i agree with the supreme court, i will say yes, just to make you happy, but i doubt scalia is really too interested in my opinion, and i don't really have a choice. SUPREME means it is the highest authority.

check it out- the citizens can have ideas about things, and tell their representatives, who then make laws, and if there are issues with the laws, your buddy scotus has the final say

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Uh, oh. BainsBane Dec 2012 #1
might be a long wait farminator3000 Dec 2012 #2
Plus it's not in the gungeon BainsBane Dec 2012 #3
nice work farminator3000 Dec 2012 #4
You've got me beat on that BainsBane Dec 2012 #18
How 'xactly are they supposed to handle this one? nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #5
by starting to drool out of confusion? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #7
Your post is a straw man... Taitertots Dec 2012 #6
you read the first line. good for you! farminator3000 Dec 2012 #9
I'm sure someone had to read it to him. Zoeisright Dec 2012 #10
Oh, it looks like I've found a little fanboi Taitertots Dec 2012 #13
Your post is non-sense Taitertots Dec 2012 #12
you are out of your element farminator3000 Dec 2012 #14
Ok, you can't post a link to the NRA claiming the Second Amendment is an unlimited right Taitertots Dec 2012 #15
i told you exactly where the link is are you lazy? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #16
It is perfectly clear that you can't produce a link that disputes anything that I've claimed Taitertots Dec 2012 #20
do you know how to use google? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #21
Why are you so afraid to actually post a link to what you claim? Taitertots Dec 2012 #22
so your google is broken or not functioning correctly farminator3000 Dec 2012 #23
should i post ya a pic of a straw man farminator3000 Dec 2012 #11
Chum in the water etherealtruth Dec 2012 #8
LOL, what new information is this? It means you can regulate guns. As most states do. Who... Logical Dec 2012 #17
um farminator3000 Dec 2012 #19
so what does that mean for the states who regulate guns? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #25
Most of the long term pro-gun DU members would agree with that. aikoaiko Dec 2012 #24
12 farminator3000 Dec 2012 #26
12 is not a bad number. aikoaiko Dec 2012 #27
i like it farminator3000 Dec 2012 #28
What's a psycho rifle? (nt) Recursion Dec 2012 #30
I don't remember anybody saying it's unlimited Recursion Dec 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Like most rights, the rig...»Reply #25