Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)
26. 12
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 01:11 AM
Dec 2012

i like the idea of a 12 bullet limit.
a six shooter in each hand-
with something like a smartphone, keeping up with the latest technology is good, not so much with guns

i think the line should be drawn at the point where personal freedom becomes a danger to society, where one type of person's 'privilege' interferes with the freedom of those who don't ask for that same thing.

kind of like drunk driving in that respect.


ie- it was just a bit frivolous of mrs. lanza to have a gun like that for target practice- at least she could have been forced to keep it at the range- if you have two handguns in your house for defense, the rifle is obviously extraneous

and, if she was having trouble getting the kid help, maybe he had a little too much freedom as well

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Uh, oh. BainsBane Dec 2012 #1
might be a long wait farminator3000 Dec 2012 #2
Plus it's not in the gungeon BainsBane Dec 2012 #3
nice work farminator3000 Dec 2012 #4
You've got me beat on that BainsBane Dec 2012 #18
How 'xactly are they supposed to handle this one? nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #5
by starting to drool out of confusion? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #7
Your post is a straw man... Taitertots Dec 2012 #6
you read the first line. good for you! farminator3000 Dec 2012 #9
I'm sure someone had to read it to him. Zoeisright Dec 2012 #10
Oh, it looks like I've found a little fanboi Taitertots Dec 2012 #13
Your post is non-sense Taitertots Dec 2012 #12
you are out of your element farminator3000 Dec 2012 #14
Ok, you can't post a link to the NRA claiming the Second Amendment is an unlimited right Taitertots Dec 2012 #15
i told you exactly where the link is are you lazy? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #16
It is perfectly clear that you can't produce a link that disputes anything that I've claimed Taitertots Dec 2012 #20
do you know how to use google? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #21
Why are you so afraid to actually post a link to what you claim? Taitertots Dec 2012 #22
so your google is broken or not functioning correctly farminator3000 Dec 2012 #23
should i post ya a pic of a straw man farminator3000 Dec 2012 #11
Chum in the water etherealtruth Dec 2012 #8
LOL, what new information is this? It means you can regulate guns. As most states do. Who... Logical Dec 2012 #17
um farminator3000 Dec 2012 #19
so what does that mean for the states who regulate guns? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #25
Most of the long term pro-gun DU members would agree with that. aikoaiko Dec 2012 #24
12 farminator3000 Dec 2012 #26
12 is not a bad number. aikoaiko Dec 2012 #27
i like it farminator3000 Dec 2012 #28
What's a psycho rifle? (nt) Recursion Dec 2012 #30
I don't remember anybody saying it's unlimited Recursion Dec 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Like most rights, the rig...»Reply #26