General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I am an Anarchist. Not a "Libertarian" or a "Galtist" but an Anarchist. [View all]renie408
(9,854 posts)popular definitions and apply meanings that suit you? I bet it is!! You, rebel, you!!
No, friend, YOU placed the use of force in exactly the wrong place. YOU stated that in your Utopia John could "lead or not" as if that was somehow different from the real world. I was responding to that.
And you are right. I do have a difficulty comprehending why you think anarchy removes force and/or coercion. It might in a perfect world with perfect people. But not even in that glorious haven of 1936 Spain, a time and place I am sure we ALL wish we could live in, did that last long.
BTW...What is stopping you? Why aren't you living in that Utopia? I would be willing to bet that somewhere people are living a basically anarchist lifestyle and given the internet, I bet you could find them. Why didn't Chomsky? He chose to espouse this wonderful, anarchist view of life while working at MIT and living in Lexington, Massachusetts. I bet he had a nice, comfortable life with all the amenities our icky, structured, governed world provides. For all that you are trapped in this awful, structured world, you could choose to check out. But it is a lot more fun to sit at your computer and call other people profoundly ignorant, huh? And besides, this awful, horrible representative democracy that you find yourself trapped in already has the police, fire department and the garbage men.
Listen, because I am not profoundly idealistic does not make me profoundly ignorant. But calling me profoundly ignorant...repeatedly...while using an obscure, failed worker's revolution as an example from the safety of your computer chair as you participate in the same society I do does make you look like a sophist, arrogant ass.
Now, call me stupid again as if that somehow makes your argument more sound. Good luck with that.