Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This [View all]chowder66
(11,674 posts)45. How about just using the mechanisms that are in place to remove someone!
They already exist but are not used. It definitely needs to be addressed though.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In other words, Trump could do this while he still has a Repug Senate, ...
JustABozoOnThisBus
Sep 15
#52
Great DU name. I couldn't think of one and both dogs started barking. So there.
twodogsbarking
Sep 15
#49
Ban anyone who commits a crime against the united states from holding office. Reform the pardon process.
chowder66
Sep 14
#11
Then you haven't been paying attention. Joe Biden ran on some version of most of these policies in 2020
Wiz Imp
Sep 14
#26
The abolishment of the Fairness Doctrine may well have been the single most consequential political act of the last
Wiz Imp
Sep 15
#42
Yes. We pay them to destroy our country, then we will have to pay for the rebuild.
Irish_Dem
Sep 15
#34